Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138; dangus; org.whodat
from 111 dangus: "Well, I was referring to percent matches of DNA among Crocodillia, Anura, Aves, and a Dinosaur DNA sample found in the 1980s.

js1138: "Do you have a link to the finding of dinosaur DNA? "

This is too laughable for words. Dinosaur DNA! ;-)

Yes, of course, DINOSAUR DNA! It was in a book, don't you see? About mosquitoes trapped in amber, remember? They even made a real scary movie from it, then sequels -- about a park, from the Jurassic era... now I remember, those frog-like velociraptors... ;-)

js1138, I hate to say this pal, but you are way too subtle for these guys! ;-)

113 posted on 02/24/2009 10:47:11 AM PST by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK

It was probably amino acid sequencing, come to think of it...


114 posted on 02/24/2009 10:50:04 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

To: BroJoeK

Just trying to move the debate forward without being rude.

There are bits and pieces of reality scattered throughout the discussion of dino DNA and frogs. But since the advent of DNA sequencing machines, anything said about DNA and lineages before 2000 is likely to be out of date.


115 posted on 02/24/2009 10:54:35 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson