> Citing 20 and 30 year old research is not helping your
> cause. Do you have any *recent* research that refutes the
> transitional fossils(described *this* month)?
Do you have anything more recent than the debunked “transitional” whales?
Do you have anything more recent than the debunked “transitional” whales?Not that I'm surprised you haven't kept up with the current literature... Google is your friend.