Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Michael Michael; LucyT; Iowan; Fred Nerks; BP2; MHGinTN
What is your political ideology and what are your political affiliations? You're a regular poster on a decidedly conservative forum. Why shouldn't your reports on the COLB be similarly dismissed due to your political leanings?

Because my critics don't need a valid reason to dismiss me. It's their sacred mission in life.

But, if you must know, I have no political affiliations and my only leanings are in the direction of my God, my Country, and my conscience. I am a Constitutionalist, as are most of the people on FR.

If you did more checking, you would find that this forum is decidedly nonpartisan when it comes to not wanting a narcissistic, racist, megalomanic, radical Leftist/Marxist/Fascist, anti-American, anti-Constitution, Anti-Israel, Anti-Semitic illegally-elected FRAUD as President, who is fleecing our pockets, holding our freedoms hostage, and Hell-bent on destroying this country before his first 100 days are gone.

Or, to put it another way, it's NOT the "change" that the other half of America "believes in." Do you need to ask me in which half I am?

Also, the last time I checked, I was not the one making a conscious effort to get a narcissistic, racist, megalomanic, radical Leftist/Marxist/Fascist, anti-American, anti-Constitution, Anti-Israel, Anti-Semitic illegally-elected FRAUD as President, who is fleecing our pockets, holding our freedoms hostage, and Hell-bent on destroying this country before his first 100 days are gone.

That honor goes to the nonpartisan Factcheck group.

But, you're right on your first comment. The fact that Soros gave Annenberg money to create the Chicago Annenberg Challenge and to elect a totally-inexperienced Obama to chair and run it along with domestic terrorist, William Ayers, as his second in command, is far more inherently relevant to why there is a fraud and usurper currently in the White House.

122 posted on 02/24/2009 4:01:48 PM PST by Polarik ("A forgery created to prove a claim repudiates that claim")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: Polarik

Yowser!


123 posted on 02/24/2009 4:03:54 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

To: Polarik
I am a Constitutionalist...

Yeah?

Judging by the entourage you brought along with you, I'd have thought you were some sort of hip-hop artist or something.


124 posted on 02/24/2009 5:39:45 PM PST by Michael Michael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

To: Polarik

Many thanks, Polarik

Excellent response.

Ping.


125 posted on 02/24/2009 9:59:40 PM PST by Iowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson