Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

H. J. RES. 5 - Bill to remove President Term Limits (not a joke!)
GovTrack.us ^ | Jan. 6, 2009 | Rep. José Serrano [D-NY]

Posted on 02/16/2009 5:31:46 PM PST by navyguy

"Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President."

... See the rest at the link ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: oldnews; termlimits; zeroworship
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: navyguy

Congressman Jose “Serrano authored the English Plus Resolution , which calls on the government to encourage all Americans to learn and use multiple languages, in addition to English. He vehemently opposes “English only” proposals because he believes that implementing such a policy would be harmful to civil rights and America’s broader national interests. In 1996, the English Plus Resolution came close to House passage, and Serrano has proposed it again in the current Congress.” (From his website)

Seems the famous congressman from the Bronx has higher aspirations...ie el presidente. It’s no wonder, like his cousin Chavez, he seeks to remove term limits for el presidente.

Turd world socialistic mentality serving in our US Congress. Should we expect any less from them? The problem is, as I see it at this juncture, we are outnumbered. The only thing we have left is our US Constitution. When it fails to prevent the socialists from a total seizure of our govt, we have but one resolve.


41 posted on 02/16/2009 6:12:30 PM PST by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
Serrano is a crooked, thieving, bribe taking Marxist.

Please, don't sugar coat it. Tell us what you really think.

42 posted on 02/16/2009 6:12:42 PM PST by lafroste (gravity is not a force. See my profile to read my novel absolutely free (I know, beyond shameless))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

Well, thank GOD they can’t put it to a vote like in Venezuela, I seriously doubt 3/4 of the states would ratify it.


43 posted on 02/16/2009 6:14:46 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

“Not that it might not happen, but it’s not like something Obama is doing.”

At least not openly.


44 posted on 02/16/2009 6:20:17 PM PST by ScottinVA (Make my world PURRRFECT, Lord Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: navyguy; All

Folks, chill out.

In the 111th Congress, this bill, introduced by Congressweenie Jose Serrano, D-NY-16, was HJ Res 5. There are no cosponsors.

In the 110th Congress, this bill, introduced by Congressweenie Jose Serrano, D-NY-16, was HJ Res 8. There were no cosponsors. It died in subcommittee without consideration.

In the 109th Congress, this bill, introduced by Congressweenie Jose Serrano, D-NY-16, was HJ Res 9. There were no cosponsors. It died in subcommittee without consideration.

In the 108th Congress, this bill, introduced by Congressweenie Jose Serrano, D-NY-16, was HJ Res 11. There were actually three cosponsors. It died in subcommittee without consideration.

In the 107th Congress, this bill, introduced by Congressweenie Jose Serrano, D-NY-16, was HJ Res 4. There were no cosponsors. It died in subcommittee without consideration.

In the 106th Congress, this bill, introduced by Congressweenie Jose Serrano, D-NY-16, was HJ Res 17. There was one cosponsor. It died in subcommittee without consideration.

In the 105th Congress, this bill, introduced by Congressweenie Jose Serrano, D-NY-16, was HJ Res 19. There was again one cosponsor. It died in subcommittee without consideration.

In the 104th Congress, this bill, introduced by Congressweenie Bawney Fwank, D-MA-, was HJ Res 68. There was one cosponsor. It died in subcommittee without consideration.

And I could keep going back. This has probably been introduced every Congress since the 22d Amendment was passed.


45 posted on 02/16/2009 6:23:36 PM PST by markomalley (Extra ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

As a reminder, the executive branch, and the legislative branch of our fed gov now has a majority of socialists at the helm.

Yes, it would take 3/4s of the states to ratify. But suppose the fed, as it has done may times in the past, regarding other laws it wished to impose, ie 55 mph, .08 alcohol levels etc., witholds funds from the states which refuse to ratify said amendment?


46 posted on 02/16/2009 6:32:11 PM PST by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Caption Congressweenie Jose Serrano and Clarence Thomas:


47 posted on 02/16/2009 6:33:01 PM PST by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
Please, will someone in TX save me a place. I'll bake you the best chocolate chip cookies you have ever tasted and Netmilsdad will take care of all your computer problems. Please.

Get here quick, we need you and yours.

48 posted on 02/16/2009 6:38:38 PM PST by avenir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

If I can’t make it - will you share the recipe? (((hugs)))


49 posted on 02/16/2009 6:41:15 PM PST by yorkie (Grandmas are antique little girls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: navyguy
You need to pay attention.
50 posted on 02/16/2009 6:44:05 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: navyguy

A Bill to repeal this Amendment has been introduced in Congress for at least the last decade or two. It has never gotten anywhere.


51 posted on 02/16/2009 6:45:55 PM PST by Tatze (I reject your reality and substitute my own!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tatze; navyguy; Browen82; Da Coyote
> Sorry to burst the bubble here, but this is the same bill which has been introduced each term since time immemorial...never passed, never going to pass.

> A Bill to repeal this Amendment has been introduced in Congress for at least the last decade or two. It has never gotten anywhere.

And in any case it would not apply to the current sitting President (Obama). Same thing as when the amendment was passed -- it didn't affect Truman (the Dem), but it affected Eisenhower (the Rep).

If the Dems were to pass this, and get 3/4 of the states to agree (never happen), the first President it would apply to would be the Republican who will follow Obama.

Everybody go back to sleep now. ;-)

52 posted on 02/16/2009 7:41:08 PM PST by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: navyguy

obuma will barely finish his first term. By 2010 obuma will be as popular as a snake in the toilet. He’ll slither away, be sent off into the witness protection program and live in a bungalow with Joey “Two-Finger” Mbuku.


53 posted on 02/16/2009 7:45:56 PM PST by sergeantdave (nobama is the anti-Lincoln who will re-institute slavery to government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: navyguy

44% of the Supreme Court through the most twisted logic ever witnessed said the second amendment doesen’t mean what it says. Be very afraid.


54 posted on 02/16/2009 8:08:49 PM PST by bittertxn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: navyguy
Thanks, navyguy.

The sponsor of the bill, Jose Serrano, seems like a real piece of work from New York. Check out what he proposed in H.Con. Res 3. The bill is called "English Plus" .

Here's a sample:

...recognize the importance of multilingualism to vital American interests and individual rights, and oppose `English-only' measures and other restrictionist language measures.

55 posted on 02/16/2009 8:17:35 PM PST by MaggieCarta (We're all Detroiters now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius; mkmensinger; caseinpoint
3/4's of the states must ratify within seven years after the date of the submission for ratification.

Guess Zero plans on (at least) two terms...

56 posted on 02/16/2009 8:24:04 PM PST by MaggieCarta (We're all Detroiters now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sender

Sorry, but I thought, no way can he get elected


57 posted on 02/16/2009 8:50:45 PM PST by Foolsgold ("We live in the greatest country in the world and I am going to change it" Barry O'boomarang 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: YellowRoseofTx

I should assume so. It would be an amendment.


58 posted on 02/16/2009 9:22:32 PM PST by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MaggieCarta

That would be quite an accomplishment: 3/4 of the states. But I don’t think this is the first time such an amendment, or repeal of the amendment has been proposed and has never gone anywhere.


59 posted on 02/16/2009 9:24:30 PM PST by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Oh my gosh, that is funny. And it’s actually true! Although it might be a little to upsetting for Nancy having to see him sitting in the Oval Office. Nancy Reagan, I meant, but hey, it might be good to give Nancy Pelosi a shock.


60 posted on 02/16/2009 10:43:30 PM PST by baa39 (Mater Dei, ora pro nobis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson