Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arlen Specter losing support of Republican peers
Patriot News ^ | Feb. 13, 2009 | LAURA VECSEY

Posted on 02/12/2009 11:04:08 PM PST by malkee

With the $789 billion economic stimulus package he helped broker set for a vote in the U.S. House and Senate, Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., phoned home Thursday to unhappy members of the Pennsylvania State Republican Committee.

The conference call was initiated by Specter, his office said. It was a "conversation" to explain his thinking for backing the spending plan that Democrats hope will deliver jobs for the tanking U.S. economy.

But a growing chorus of Pennsylvania state Republican officials say their faith in Specter is irretrievably broken.

And some are vowing to defeat Specter in the Republican primary in 2010.

"It's clear we need a conservative senator who can do the right thing for America," said Glen Meakem, a conservative talk show host in Pennsylvania.

"It's over for Arlen. He would do best to retire gracefully," he said, adding that party leaders across the state have intensified talks about a primary challenge against Specter.

The old GOP adage that it is better to have Specter in the Senate than a Democrat apparently no longer holds true.

Some Pennsylvania Republican officials are so eager to drum up a legitimate opponent to run against Specter, they've started a wish list that includes two prominent Republicans who've said they're exploring a run -- for governor.

Jim Roddy, chairman of the Allegheny County Republican Committee, suggested two names: Pat Toomey and U.S. Rep. Jim Gerlach, R-Chester Springs.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: arlenspecter; arlensphincter; glenmeakem; jimgerlach; rat; rats; rino; rinos; specter; toomey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: snowstorm12
Is the 15,000 tax credit for new home buyers still in the bill? I thought that was one of the few things good about the bill.

Why should I--who can't afford to buy a home--be forced to give my tax money to subsidize a home for others?!?

Please pitch the collectivism into the sewer where it belongs.

21 posted on 02/12/2009 11:44:01 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

Okay, so you believe it’s better to have a Democrat in there, I guess...?


22 posted on 02/12/2009 11:45:02 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TheEaglehasLanded

Specter is so off-the-wall that he just might vote against it. But I don’t think I’d bet on it.


23 posted on 02/12/2009 11:45:54 PM PST by malkee (Actually I'm an ex-smoker--two and a half years-- But I think about it every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Nephi
Has anyone asked Specter, “Why the rush to endorse this bill that is being passed as an emergency stimulus, but doesn’t really go into effect for two or more years?”

Unfortunately, those who have had the opportunity in front of the camera have squandered it, from what I have seen. :-( Let's hope he gets on the hot seat soon!

24 posted on 02/12/2009 11:46:08 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

If Moderates can’t vote for Conservatives, then they’re responsible for the rise of the Democrats AND the RINOs.


25 posted on 02/12/2009 11:46:59 PM PST by Mojave (Barack Obama is a joke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: malkee

I’d like to see Gerlach take his seat.


26 posted on 02/12/2009 11:47:13 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
Isn't there another tax credit if you buy a new car too?

What the hell, give us a tax credit for buying food. The country is losing its collective mind and soul.

27 posted on 02/12/2009 11:47:17 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (Obamunism, the fatal cure for Bush Derangement Syndrome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

Fine. Is anyone questioning that?


28 posted on 02/12/2009 11:47:50 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative
The country is losing its collective mind and soul.

If only it would lose its collectivist mind and soul.

29 posted on 02/12/2009 11:48:26 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

A tax credit is where the government takes money at gunpoint and then gives it back to you if you do what they say..and fines you a higher rate if you don’t.

Oh, joy.


30 posted on 02/12/2009 11:49:16 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

So Conservatives must vote for Moderates, while Moderates won’t vote for Conservatives? That’s a recipe for the demise of Conservatism and the triumph of the RINOs.


31 posted on 02/12/2009 11:50:42 PM PST by Mojave (Barack Obama is a joke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
So Conservatives must vote for Moderates, while Moderates won’t vote for Conservatives? That’s a recipe for the demise of Conservatism and the triumph of the RINOs.

As is conservatives voting for conservatives and shunning the moderates.

How about this idea...instead of trying to muscle the politics, let's convince the moderates that conservatism is the way to go?

What a concept, eh?

32 posted on 02/12/2009 11:58:23 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
let's convince the moderates that conservatism is the way to go?

Yeah. Lemme know how that goes. Just because conservatives have been shafted every time they've trusted moderates in the past is no reason to think that it won't work out next time.

33 posted on 02/13/2009 12:02:28 AM PST by Mojave (Barack Obama is a joke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

Conservatives sometimes vote for moderates when the choice is between a moderate and a liberal, or would vote for a moderate when that moderate is the more conservative. See the 2008 Presidential race.


34 posted on 02/13/2009 12:03:29 AM PST by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: malkee

I no uncertain terms I told Alexander(TN) to dump him. It’s the choice of the party to choose. If they keep him I go on a perpetual fishing trip.


35 posted on 02/13/2009 12:06:27 AM PST by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator

By that logic the only answer is that the Republicans should have lost in PA. If winning meant we had to put in a man who would vote for this evil monstrosity of a bill... we should have run the conservative and lost. You lead by showing your character. Spectre has none and only does our party damage when he is used as an example of a Republican. It’s that simple. This is out there in the black and white, right and wrong zone without much grey.

If more of these “moderates” as you call them will not vote for a real Republican, then they aren’t “moderates”. They are simply disinfranchised Democrats and havn’t been badly mugged enough by socialism to know better.

The time for fence straddling is ending. The fence is breaking under the weight of these “moderates”. Sides must be taken.

Better the enemy you know than the enemy you don’t know. If we can’t predict how Spectre will vote, or trust him to do the right thing when it is lit with a neon sign right in front of him then run him out of the party. His current actions make him incompatible with Republicanism. Better he be out of it and switch sides than give the enemy the ammo of being able to call everything they do “bipartisan” whenever Spectre votes with the Dems.

Say whatever you want about reality, this bill goes way beyond politics and right down to core beliefs. If he will vote for a freedom ending multi-trillion dollar power grab then it doesn’t matter one bit what party he calls himself. He’s a lib Democrat who happens to have an “R” after his name. He might as well get official and call himself one to make scorekeeping easier.

“An enemy stabs you in the back, a friend stabs you in the front.” - Which have these three Republican senators done? They have stabbed our party in the back in the most dire hour of need in a generation. They alone have the power to stall this pork bill up until it dies. They won’t do it. They are no friends of our party, or our country. Their mettle has been tested and they won’t stand up for us when times get tough.

Recall them now. Throw them out. Even if it means a Dem gets the seats. How can anyone respect our party or take our beliefs seriously if we allow this kind of garbage to infect the image we project to the entire country? The image we project to the very people we want on our side? The house we keep must be cleaner than it is now before we will begin to win over more voters.


36 posted on 02/13/2009 12:08:29 AM PST by Advil000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: malkee

What a spineless useless wuss. He can’t even hold up for his own treacherous action-he ignores anyone trying to contact him to oppose his vote, he has a snide auto-message to anyone outside his constituency who emails him, he stubbornly goes his own way for his own personal benefit in voting for the huge tax heist and funding of ACORN—then he calls home to see if anyone still loves him. What a wuss. Just be a proud traitor Specter, at least hold up for what you do. AfFAIK even the two traitorous *itches aren’t phoning around to make sure everybody will still love them after they betrayed their party and the American people. They just did it and pretended to be proud of it (OK maybe they weren’t pretending).


37 posted on 02/13/2009 12:16:15 AM PST by mrsmel (Put the Gitmo terrorists near Capitol Hill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinanju
A GIANTIC DITTO ON THAT ONE.

Arlen Spector, IMHO, has no respect for anyone other than his ego.

President Bush campaign for him and Spector won on W's coat tails.

Can anyone tell me what goes through the folks in Pennsylvania’s mind? All I can think of is PORK.

BTW, where on line can I find the 48 hour posting of the “stimulus” bill? Maybe it's so transparent my computer can't see it.

38 posted on 02/13/2009 12:21:32 AM PST by not2worry (WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

Well, your approach hasn’t seemed to do too well in the past few elections...I was kinda hoping you might want success for a change, going back to the Reagan model of educating the voters, getting them on your side, and then moving forward.


39 posted on 02/13/2009 12:21:39 AM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
Well, your approach hasn’t seemed to do too well in the past few elections..

Your guy McCain gave the presidency to Obama.

I was kinda hoping you might want success for a change, going back to the Reagan model of educating the voters, getting them on your side, and then moving forward.

Please got smear Reagan with your agenda.

"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn’t make any sense at all." -- Ronald Reagan, 1965

40 posted on 02/13/2009 12:32:06 AM PST by Mojave (Barack Obama is a joke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson