Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gandalftb

So when a thing like a room-sized satellite breaks, the fragments, which are now individually lighter than the original whole, start assuming higher orbits...

Am I correct?


8 posted on 02/11/2009 9:01:36 PM PST by MyTwoCopperCoins (I don't have a license to kill; I have a learner's permit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MyTwoCopperCoins
From the article:

debris going into higher and lower orbits

No need to throw out energy conservation just yet.

9 posted on 02/11/2009 9:10:30 PM PST by eclecticEel (Wall Street isn't a charity ... so why are we giving them money?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

The remnants would probably shoot off in various trajectories. It wasn’t a bump or a fender bender.


10 posted on 02/11/2009 9:11:47 PM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

No. Although it sounds reasonable, weight has nothing to do with orbit size. In orbit everything is in free-fall around the earth, and therefore “weightless”.

Parts scatter into new orbits because the kinetic energy of the space craft translates into a big explosion when they collide. That explosion sends fragments out in all directions at high speed, some go up, some down.


12 posted on 02/11/2009 9:15:51 PM PST by null and void (We are now in day 23 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins
Sorry, but no.

All items at a particular altitude speed and direction will follow the same orbit regardless of size and mass (weight).

The reason the debris is going to higher and lower orbits, is that individual fragments have assumed a wide variety of different velocities and directions after the impact.

Also if there were any pressurized gases in tanks on either satellite that exploded, this would have accelerated debris nearby even further in different directions.

Acceleration in this case, means some debris items might have been SLOWED in velocity. This would result in them having an average orbit lower than before the collision / explosion.

SO the net speed and direction from the impact of each debris item will detemine that item's new orbit. AND they will be all over the place.

What a mess...

24 posted on 02/11/2009 9:37:08 PM PST by muffaletaman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

When you break a coconut in half do the pieces rise?


39 posted on 02/11/2009 10:13:49 PM PST by newguy357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

Has more to do with Mass and acceleration, some particles will go into a higher orbit because they have more energy. Others will go slower, and fall into the atmosphere. Think of it like a marble in a funnel, if you keep swirling or swirl harder the Marble will go higher up in the come. A gravity well is a similar idea.


43 posted on 02/11/2009 10:23:01 PM PST by Danae (Amerikan Unity My Ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson