What if single-celled life forms came to Earth in comets? And evolved from there? The two can be separate concerns.
No, all this argument does is pushes the venue to another location.
Pray tell, where and how did that “comet” travelling life form begin? It’s all about the beginninngs. Either God created or “chance occurred”.
Please do not tell me you may subscribe to the “Mission to Mars” construct that aliens sent something to earth——still begs the question of the origin of LIFE, No?
God bless
>>Nope. Both are necessary components to the theology of evolutionism.
>
>What if single-celled life forms came to Earth in comets? And evolved from there? The two can be separate concerns.
No, that’s just moving the problem to another place. Where did the single-cells on the comet come from? How did THEY move from non-living to living matter?
Not a creationists but this argument is just an attempt to get around the start of life thing. It doesn't matter if life came here on a comet, how did it start "spontaneously" on some other planet if it can't do it here, and how in the hell did it leap off a planet onto a comet? This argument is a cop out! So, no, you can't have one without the other.
What if single-celled life forms came to Earth in comets? And evolved from there? The two can be separate concerns.
But one (evolution) would not exist without the other.
In chapter one of any virtually any textbook addressing evolution, it begins with origins.
Time to deal with it.
What if different, unrelated single-celled life-forms came to Earth on more than one comet? That would mean that all life may not be descended from one common ancestor, as Darwinists claim.