Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cyropaedia
What you have to rely on is what they actually did say when they did decide to speak about the citizenship clause and what kind of jurisdiction was required.

And the only time they spoke of that was with regard to Indians. Who, in spite of your blatant ignorance, were not in any way similar to immigrants, Chinese or otherwise.


465 posted on 02/13/2009 2:55:08 PM PST by Michael Michael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies ]


To: Michael Michael
And the only time they spoke of that was with regard to Indians.

Bullsh*t.

They spoke about "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof..." within the context of the of the 14th Amendment. That Amendment begins the the words, "All persons...".

"All persons..." encompasses foreign nationals/immigrants.

Again,Senator Trumball specifically said,

"The provision is, that ‘all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.’ That means ‘subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.’ What do we mean by ‘complete jurisdiction thereof?’ Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means."

Foreign allegiance on the part of immigrants is something that has always been recognized by our laws and lawmakers. That is precisely why every immigrant that becomes a fully naturalized citizen is legally required to renounce all allegiances to their country of origin and its government as part of their Citizenship oath.

466 posted on 02/13/2009 7:26:39 PM PST by Cyropaedia ("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson