Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Frantzie; BP2; unspun; Iowan; LucyT; IrishPennant; Chief Engineer; Dajjal; hoosiermama; ...

Yeah I stopped too listening to “Old Ed”. Had enough. I hold your impression of Pidgeon being primarily onto the 1981 use of passport and can only hope. My stopping w/ PR/EH was very close to those exchanges.

As to military, so very hard to suss but I did pick up (will look if someone really insists, and it’d still be a chore, but one was there somewhere) a poll of active military on ‘gays-in-military’ and O’s presumed inviting / outing the Hershey Highwaymen that had it ten percent would leave with another 25 percent ah, uncomfortable. These numbers make sense to me as minimums.

That same ten percent MUST be rock-ribbed conservatives who’ve been exposed to a healthy dose of O-is-Usurper. Thus I make the rational guess that they would actually welcome the opportunity to leave under the single reason they can openly (enough) agree on: homosexuals in. The muffled talk HAS to be there on both subjects: leaving because of the sodomites and their hero’s ineligibility.

The shills are listening to their own. It’s fairly easy to find that, as I recall off top of head, another ten percent have been accepted off the streets as known gang members. They’d like their Bammy and I’d guess another 25 percent are so PC’d up they’d be doing the ‘favorable’ thing, especially the Wiccan lesbians and some other females getting way-much ah, male attention…and those playboys who could care less about anything except getting shot. The military might appear to be in tatters, but I’m sure if one divided it roughly into thirds as I’ve done, the middle third would not be bidding Bush goodbye without great regrets. I’m under impression there is a sizeable percentage that resents the service contractors (Blackwater) but they’re probably just carping as one branch does another. Some percent of them might shoot their mouth(s) off they have chance to give an opinion out going back home, as they’d welcome a downsizing to get rid of Blackwater, but if push came to shove they’d favor the departed Chief over the incoming quasi-Muslim madman. I’m not an avid student of these things nor know actives in the theatres. I just try to stay aware via internet and talk-radio. One also gets hints of voting patterns this way, could try to trace latest numbers if I had to, if they’re available (who knows given this past “election”). I’m talking rank-and-file too. I doubt the esteemed Gen. Petraeus had any time to neuter (tee-hee) the Clintonite brass, but who in their right mind would seriously listen to Clinton-appointed upper-levels in a pole on homosexuality?

I think its safe to say two-thirds easy (probably approaching three-quarters) of active rank-and-file military is regretful that O is ‘on the job’. They can’t “say” it, as we all know. They have to do the donkey nod.


171 posted on 02/10/2009 7:19:06 PM PST by BonRad (As Rome goes so goes the world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: BonRad; Frantzie; BP2; Chief Engineer

Tony Blankley may know more about the subject of present military attitudes than anyone I can think of, again me just plugging into the new media.

He IS an avid student of the military today, and I saw an interview on youtube or popmodal recently (I think it was from a year ago or even late 2007-alas B4COLB) wherein he said that he went on Atlas Shruggs website often. The subject of the interview was a potential draft.


199 posted on 02/10/2009 8:18:01 PM PST by BonRad (As Rome goes so goes the world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson