The passenger who witnessed that he had no passport, sent a copy of his ticket receipt for proof he observed the terrorist before boarding. In his statement he adamantly stated the supervisor said” we let people on all the time from Nigeria without passports, due to the fact of problems with that country.” This must be a known fact to the terrorists.
Also, I have since heard a few reporters/radio personalities state Denmark has its reputation for laxity.
That if he was cleared in one country he would not be questioned in another.
All of it makes about as much sense as Napalitano
Janet & BO were so blaise about this, speculation from me: The key is the "Well dressed man" that accompanied Mutallab, was he mayhaps a LEO to either insure this terrorist was caught or (putting conspiracy hat on) so there is even MORE control from the "One World" groupies. I mean, look, the first thing done is more control. Everything this admin does involves us losing more liberties and our constitution thrown out the window. Bet I'm not the only one thinking this.
~Just a thought
UPDATED- Could Obama have handled the Christmas Day attack any worse?
Looking for clarification: was it the supervisor or the “sharp-dressed man” who said that? I thought it was the man... though the main prob is the fact that Mutallab was able to get on at all, and we need to know how that happened.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2415422/posts?page=2