The new American in Obamalot....
Posted on 02/07/2009 8:14:02 PM PST by Syncro
Grand Cuts Indeed
PoliGazette -
Specter and Collins are betraying the principles of good government and of conservatism by supporting this porkulus
Non-Union Need Not Apply | KXNet.com North Dakota News
KXMC, ND -
Payback from Obama to the Unions that supported his candidacy was to be expected, but like the gigantic Porkulus
Limbaugh, Hannity, and the GOP: an iron triangle of stimulus ...
Media Matters for America, DC -
And they tell us, by the way, it's going to get worse if this stimulus bill, "Porkulus"
Collins: I might vote against the final stimulus bill if it’s too ...
Hot Air, MD -
And let’s hear her answer the mechanisms that she sees this Porkulus
Obama touts his economic stimulus plan as 'absolutely necessary ...
Minneapolis Star Tribune, MN -
This porkulus
Census Power Grab?
Canada Free Press, Canada -
By Matthew Vadum Saturday, February 7, 2009 With all of Washington and most of the media mesmerized by debate on the porkulus
Lawmakers poised to reshape green energy initiative
Longview Daily News, WA -
We are about to spend trillions...on a porkulus
Return of the real Kevin Hangman
Napa Valley Register, CA -
... ...tax cuts that stimulated the economy far more than Obama’s $1.2 trillion “porkulus”
(Excerpt) Read more at news.google.com ...
From Washington, DC, to California; from Canada to South Africa and Qatar the world knows that this "stimulus" bill is nothing more than the democrats plan to feed themselves and their friends and buy votes.
“You could call this the ‘porkulus,’” said Limbaugh. “Right,” laughed Cantor. “Let me tell you something: it is porkulus. That’s a great description.”
WTG Rush!
I thought Google was in bed with Mr O. ?
Google isn’t a union shop. ;)
LOL just a few hits from yahoo search as well...
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=porkulus&ei=UTF-8&fr=moz2
Try to pull up the wikipedia result for “porkulus”. You get a “This page has been deleted.” Care to guess if the owner(s) of Wikipedia are Obama sycophants?
2009 ways to serve Porkulus
by Barak Hussein Obama
Foreword from the socialists and moderates of the US Congre$$
Introduction by Nanny Pelosi and Harry Reid
LOL, almaost a million in less than one tenth of a second!
Wikipedia: Articles for deletion/Porkulus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion Jump to: navigation, search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:50, 6 February 2009 (UTC) [edit] Porkulus
Porkulus (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)
Protologism with little to no assertion of notability. XenocideTalk|Contributions 21:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete Neologism, no reliable sources found on google web search, so it's non-notable Pattont/c 21:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Reliable source (Wall Street Journal) is in the references section. Because it is a neologism, it is timely right now. Should it fade from use without historical import, it would be appropriate to delete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gustnado (talk • contribs) 21:53, February 1, 2009
That's not a reference, the word was used once in a newspaper article, it's not an article about the term.--Pattont/c 21:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
The references establish the usage and definition of the term. —Gustnado (talk contribs) 22:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
It is, however, trivial coverage (Ty whoevr fixed the double AfD)--Pattont/c 23:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
It is, however, the precise defining coverage.--Gustnado (talk) 23:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Neologism. Other than the fact that someone called the package "porkulus", it does not contribute to our knowledge of the subject. GregorB (talk) 22:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
It contributes to our knowledge of political humor and commentary. It is not meant to contribute to our knowledge of the legislation. comment added by Gustnado (talkcontribs) 22:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete Non-notable neologism. --Peephole (talk) 22:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Protologism. Should it become widely used in the future, article may be recreated. . ¨¨ victor falk 05:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete without prejudice. Just because a word is created in an opinion piece doesn't make it notable. Will Beback talk 19:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
I'll accept that and I created the page. (oops, forget to log in)--Gustnado (talk) 00:20, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete - This 'word' has only just been used for the first time, is an expression of one particular point of view on a topic with an existing article, and is treated here by way of a dictionary definition. AlexTiefling (talk) 16:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete - Non-notable protologism. (WP:NEO) — neuro(talk) 00:56, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page
The new American in Obamalot....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guadalcanal_Rat
Interestingly, “porculus” yields the above result (an extinct rodent). I feel sorry for the rat, but not for the careers of Democrats, which will undergo mass extinctions beginning in 2010.
“I, Porkulus.” Too good!
LOL! I gave up after 14 pages!
AT 11:44pm CST, a google for Porkulus reads:
Results 1 - 10 of about 60,300 for porkulus.
Plus 14,800 web references posted over the past 24 hours for the term “Porkulus” according to Google Advanced Search.
Anyone have that video of when Obama said “you can’t put lipstick on a pig? and everyone thought he was referring to Sarah? takes on a whole new meaning now, doesn’t it?
And the Rats have been kissed by that pig in lipstick. The smear of that porkulus bill Obama is trying to jam down America’s throats is marking all of them now. Dumb voters who could not see the truth about this man and his intentions and the Chicago machine that put him in the race in the first place.
What do you think SPENDING IS? its PORKULUS /zero rant off
>>AT 11:44pm CST, a google for Porkulus reads:
Results 1 - 10 of about 60,300 for porkulus.<<
At 9:43 AM CST the google results for Porkulus reads:
Results 1 - 10 of about 62,800 for Porkulus. (0.06 seconds)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.