Replies

>>...digitally-fabricated images of a semblance of a Certification form with Obama’s alleged personal information on it. There's absolutely no credible evidence of digital fabrication.

There's plenty of evidence that the FactCheck CoLB is a fraudulent.

The Hawaiian Department of Health used different variations of the design of the Official State Seal as one of their security measures to help pinpoint forgeries.

So, the proper seal design has match the year the CoLB was issued from the DoH.

By law, if the CoLB is without a seal, or a phony seal, it is not a valid Certification of Live Birth.

I defy Obama show that CoLB that appeared in the FactCheck photos in a Court of law.

I wouldn’t waste a lot of energy going point-by-point with that newbie. He seems to have signed on just to plague eligibility threads. I violated my iron rule not to post to trolls just because he’s new but that’s the last time. He knows all the facts you cited but he’ll proceed to use weasel words and BS to try to refute them, just wait and see.

For starters, it has an improper Seal "stamped" on the document. It has a 2006/2008 seal instead of the correct 2007 state seal. The Registrar's stamp said the CoLB was issued by the DoH on June 6th, 2007.

There is no credible evidence that the the seal used on documents in 2006 and 2008 would or could never have been used on a document issued in 2007. That claim is based purely on assumption and has not been substantiated by anyone with the Hawaii Department of Health.

The Hawaiian Department of Health used different variations of the design of the Official State Seal as one of their security measures to help pinpoint forgeries.

Yes. And the border on Obama's certificate is identical to the border used on other 2007 certificates. So I don't see what your point is here.

So, the proper seal design has match the year the CoLB was issued from the DoH.

Again, this claim is based entirely on assumption and has never been substantiated by anyone at the Hawaii Department of Health.

I'm sorry, but I don't see how unsubstantiated claims based purely on assumptions constitutes "plenty of evidence" that it is fraudulent.

"There's plenty of evidence that the FactCheck CoLB is a fraudulent."
I personally haven't a clue whether it's real for fraudulent. I know Polarik has spent an inordinate amount of time proving it a phony, so I'll side with him. However, I'm not sure what that has to do with the location of the birth of BO. It's not like you can run into court with a phony document to prove anything. It's like spending 500 hours proving that the green car this guy says he drove in college was really chartreuse. OK, I'm impressed, but this knowledge and $6 will get me a cup of Starbuck's coffee.

"I defy Obama show that CoLB that appeared in the FactCheck photos in a Court of law." Hmmm... or what? This sounds remarkably like the beginning of a challenge for a dick measuring contest on a playground. It's questionable which would be more proof of his citizenship.