To: Cyropaedia
"
There's plenty of evidence that the FactCheck CoLB is a fraudulent."
I personally haven't a clue whether it's real for fraudulent. I know Polarik has spent an inordinate amount of time proving it a phony, so I'll side with him. However, I'm not sure what that has to do with the location of the birth of BO. It's not like you can run into court with a phony document to prove anything. It's like spending 500 hours proving that the green car this guy says he drove in college was really chartreuse. OK, I'm impressed, but this knowledge and $6 will get me a cup of Starbuck's coffee.
"
I defy Obama show that CoLB that appeared in the FactCheck photos in a Court of law." Hmmm... or what? This sounds remarkably like the beginning of a challenge for a dick measuring contest on a playground. It's questionable which would be more proof of his citizenship.
1,008 posted on
02/07/2009 10:30:40 PM PST by
HawaiianGecko
(Online internet polls are foolish: Winston Churchill, 1939)
To: HawaiianGecko
I personally haven't a clue whether it's real for fraudulent. I know Polarik has spent an inordinate amount of time proving it a phony, so I'll side with him. However, I'm not sure what that has to do with the location of the birth of BO. Well, if the CoLB is fraudulent, then it means that he hasn't provided proof of his eligibility and most likely does not meet the qualifications specified in the Constitution. There is only one reason people create phony birth certificates: to conceal the true circumstances of their birth.
Creating a phony B.C. is a violation of the law, BTW. That would be another strike against B.O..
1,025 posted on
02/07/2009 11:06:24 PM PST by
Cyropaedia
("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson