To: srweaver
We dont even know if he had it (ever). There has been no proof proffred (other that the suspect online certification which would not pass muster in a court of law.
I've found nothing particularly suspect about it. And the scanned image was never intended to be proffered before a court of law. It was only ever intended for dissemination to the public at large.
Obama claims to have been a British citizen. Who knows what citizenship(s) he may have attained through connections with his Indonesian stepfather Soetoro.
None of which would have had any effect on his US citizenship.
This could all be cleared up by just a smidgen of transparency and nominal access to basic records.
That's a political issue. Anyone who felt that Obama had not provided enough information to the public was perfectly free not to vote for him.
Methinks when Barack speaks of transparency, he speaks of others, not of himself of those closely associated with him.
Again, that's a political issue.
To: Michael Michael
What is the number on that talking point? ... The one where you are instructed to try and switch the issue to citizenship and ignore the issue of natural born citizenship. You obamanoids are repeating the talking points a bit too often at FR, we’ve seen them too often to be misdirected the way you intend. Besides, there is no proof that he’s even a citizen, only hearsay.
1,164 posted on
02/08/2009 4:54:59 PM PST by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson