Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gondring

“Injecting these stem cells into these people with spinal cord injuries is not resulting in the destruction of any embryos.”

The stem cells come from embryos that have been destroyed. There is no other way to get them.

You cannot inject embryonic stem cells until you have them to inject. That requires destruction of embryos.


306 posted on 02/05/2009 5:48:33 PM PST by mjaneangels@aolcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies ]


To: mjaneangels@aolcom
The stem cells come from embryos that have been destroyed. There is no other way to get them.

Not true, as has been pointed out a few times on the thread.

You cannot inject embryonic stem cells until you have them to inject. That requires destruction of embryos.

American liberty required the sacrifice of patriots' lives. Are you saying that by exercising liberties today, we are killing patriots?

No embryos or blastocyst will be killed by this research; this line was generated more than a decade ago. Are you saying that this potential help for mankind should be discarded, rather than potentially saving lives? Using it does not take any lives, but may save lives. That seems to be the pro-life approach. Discarding it wouldn't take any lives, and wouldn't help save any lives. That doesn't seem to be the pro-life choice...it seems to be the agenda-driven, anti-humanity path.

310 posted on 02/05/2009 10:12:13 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson