Skip to comments.
Officials confirm Warner fumbled at game's end
NBC Sports ^
| 2/2/09
| Tom Curran
Posted on 02/02/2009 4:02:54 PM PST by TheBigB
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-200 next last
Everybody play nice. ;o)
1
posted on
02/02/2009 4:02:54 PM PST
by
TheBigB
To: TheBigB
It was not a fumble. His arm was moving forward. The ball went forward at an angle of a pass. and it wasn’t knocked out from behind.
Either way. In the super bowl. The replay booth should have took several minutes to review that one.
2
posted on
02/02/2009 4:05:13 PM PST
by
se_ohio_young_conservative
("Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice." Barry Goldwater)
To: se_ohio_young_conservative
Perhaps you should read the article again. It was a fumble.
3
posted on
02/02/2009 4:06:19 PM PST
by
Petronski
(For the next few years, Gethsemane will not be marginal. We will know that garden. -- Cdl. Stafford)
To: se_ohio_young_conservative
well I didn’t see any of the cardinals players dive for the ball so I guess they all thought it was a pass too.
4
posted on
02/02/2009 4:06:59 PM PST
by
Ainast
To: se_ohio_young_conservative
if that had happened to new england, the league would institute the new “I meant to tuck but didn’t quite make it and my arm was moving forward” rule..
5
posted on
02/02/2009 4:06:59 PM PST
by
GeorgiaDawg32
(A democrat will break your leg, then hand you a crutch and take credit for your being able to walk.)
To: TheBigB
The problem of these delayed official reviews is just that, they delay the flow of the game and create doubt in the minds of the fans as to whether the field judges have any autonomy, even the player’s get taken off stride and momentum can swing on a single reversal.
Better to just accept the field decisions and let the game go on.
6
posted on
02/02/2009 4:07:19 PM PST
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
To: Petronski
Perhaps you should read his post, again. He said it was “not” a fumble.
To: TheBigB
Presenting the face of the
Steeler-hating Super Bowl Truther:
8
posted on
02/02/2009 4:08:56 PM PST
by
Petronski
(For the next few years, Gethsemane will not be marginal. We will know that garden. -- Cdl. Stafford)
To: TheBigB
That is what I saw. He did not have control as his arm came forward.
9
posted on
02/02/2009 4:09:09 PM PST
by
A message
To: GeorgiaDawg32
I had no idea the Patriots were in the Superbowl this year. How on earth did I miss that?
10
posted on
02/02/2009 4:09:48 PM PST
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: se_ohio_young_conservative
Right, right, right, right.
The NFL is starting to resemble to NBA.
11
posted on
02/02/2009 4:09:50 PM PST
by
devere
To: Dutchboy88
He said it was “not” a fumble.That is why he needed to be corrected.
12
posted on
02/02/2009 4:09:50 PM PST
by
Petronski
(For the next few years, Gethsemane will not be marginal. We will know that garden. -- Cdl. Stafford)
To: TheBigB
Sure. The NFL is becoming a joke.
13
posted on
02/02/2009 4:10:26 PM PST
by
nickcarraway
(Are the Good Times Really Over?)
To: Dutchboy88
NOT a fumble??
The replay assistant in the replay booth saw it was clearly a fumble
What part of CLEARLY A FUMBLE makes it NOT a fumble??
14
posted on
02/02/2009 4:10:35 PM PST
by
RaceBannon
(We have sown the wind, but we will reap the whirlwind. NObama. Not my president.)
To: se_ohio_young_conservative
Really? Well, did you notice that Larry Fitzgerald's first touchdown catch was an incomplete pass? The nose of the ball hit the ground, and he didn't have posession. He also should have been flagged on Harrison's interception for a touchdown because he didn't come back in bounds immediately after being pushed out. He chased Harrison while out-of-bounds.
And, it WAS a fumble! Haha!
15
posted on
02/02/2009 4:10:36 PM PST
by
Longhair_and_Leather
(The new presidential mantra--"Obama let babies die")
To: Petronski
16
posted on
02/02/2009 4:10:41 PM PST
by
Yorlik803
( Freedom- 07-04-1776-11-06-2008. RIP)
To: se_ohio_young_conservative
Correct.
A ball doesn’t fly forward 12 feet when it’s fumbled.
Not that the Cards really had a prayer with five seconds left, but they were entitled to one more play.
17
posted on
02/02/2009 4:11:21 PM PST
by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: Petronski
18
posted on
02/02/2009 4:12:18 PM PST
by
netmilsmom
(Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
To: Petronski
I saw the ball roll in his hand, but then I saw him regain control as his arm moved forward. Maybe I was seeing what I wanted to see, but that’s what I saw.
They only had one or two more plays anyway, so it would have been a long shot at best.
The Steelers won, that’s for sure. However, the Cardinals deserved to win as much as the Steelers did, and it could have gone either way. What a great game.
19
posted on
02/02/2009 4:13:10 PM PST
by
savedbygrace
(You are only leading if someone follows. Otherwise, you just wandered off... [Smokin' Joe])
To: RaceBannon
You two are rich. The replay was clear...
He had forward motion of his arm, no one contacted the ball to push it loose, the tackle changed the course of the trajectory, it hit the ground before being picked up.
What part of clearly an incomplete pass don’t you and Petronski understand?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-200 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson