It's getting almost embarassing watching you shoot yourself in the foot over and over, and then insulting me ("then they go ugly" after calling me a moron) when you realize you're in a corner you put yourself in.
OK--one last time:
I said Palin’s first veto was based on balancine the state budget.
"Gov. Sarah Palin vetoed a bill Thursday that sought to block the state from giving public employee benefits such as health insurance to same-sex couples. "In the first veto of an administration that isn't yet a month old..."
http://dwb.adn.com/news/government/legislature/story/8525563p-8419318c.html
"... but used her very first veto to prevent a bill that would have banned gay state employees from extending benefits to their partners..."
http://www.poligazette.com/2008/08/29/sarah-palin-first-impressions/
"Palin's first veto was used to block legislation that would have barred the state from granting benefits to gay state employees and their partners. In effect, her veto granted State of Alaska benefits to same-sex couples. The veto occurred after Palin consulted with Alaska's attorney general on the constitutionality of the legislation."
http://losttarget.blogspot.com/2008/08/sarah-palin-nra-life-member-fisherman.html
Read up on things before you comment. Spouting off ignorantly around here is not recommended.
Agreed.
Take your own advice. You won't look as stupid as you do right now.
Gotcha.
Like shooting fish in a barrel.
I hope by now you realize that you’ve proved my point.
I’ve led you to think I was unaware of Palin’s veto of same sex benefits, but - more than that - I wanted to see if you would or could acknowledge that she was constrained by the Alaska Constitution. But you did not.
Why would you attack Sarah Palin in that fashion?
I still maintain you are pro-gay/pro-abortion. And a Palin basher to boot.