I think too many of you are starting to get on the case of the judge about this statement:
“There should be a law that law abiding citizens with no felony convictions should own a gun,”
I think what he is means is that he sarcastically believes there should be a law that makes it illegal for a law abiding citizen to NOT have a gun.
There should be a law that law abiding citizens with no felony convictions should own a gun,
I agree.
I think what he is means is that he sarcastically believes there should be a law that makes it illegal for a law abiding citizen to NOT have a gun.
I disagree that he is being sarcastic. There are places in the US that make it mandatory to own a firearm. He seems to say that he thinks it should similarly be a requirement.
Where Gun Ownership Is Mandatory,(^) Reason Magazine.
Also, Virgin, Utah(^) requires firearm ownership.
I am nearly positive that there are a handful of other places that require firearms ownership, but those are the two I know by name right off the bat.