[[DallasMike is not a liar.
]]
I’ve already caught him in one- Trying to insinuate that Macroevolutionary science is settled on the matter and that all of science evidence points to old earth age- it does not- Now perhaps he’s just unaware there is plenty of young earth evidnece- but I strongly doubt that if he’s been here any length of time as plenty has been posted.
If these guys truly are scientists (as they claim), I think I am finally starting to figure out why there is so much fraud connected to the same. They don’t check their facts, and when you call them on their many errors, they try to paper over them as though the errors never happened. No wonder so many Americans are losing their faith in science. Science itself is not the problem, it’s the scientists who are abusing the public’s trust who are causing their field of knowledge to fall into disrepute.
There has been zero young earth “evidence” produced by anyone who is not a disciple of Bishop Ussher...
There have been plenty of “Yabbuts” — but not a single shred of replicable or measurable actual evidence.
I am fully aware of the YEC claims for young-earth evidence, but not aware of any evidence that meets scientific scrutiny.
There's a big difference. I can make a post saying that I am 212 years old. Is that evidence? No, it's a claim.
As for the "evidence" that has been posted, it's very easily refuted.
I am a science by training and profession. So is TXnMA. Do you think that it maybe, just might be possible that what we write has a little more credibility than the musings of someone without science training?