[DallasMike]

Now perhaps he’s just unaware there is plenty of young earth evidnece- but I strongly doubt that if he’s been here any length of time as plenty has been posted.

I am fully aware of the YEC claims for young-earth evidence, but not aware of any evidence that meets scientific scrutiny.

There's a big difference. I can make a post saying that I am 212 years old. Is that evidence? No, it's a claim.

As for the "evidence" that has been posted, it's very easily refuted.

I am a science by training and profession. So is TXnMA. Do you think that it maybe, just might be possible that what we write has a little more credibility than the musings of someone without science training?

[CottShop]

[[As for the “evidence” that has been posted, it’s very easily refuted.]]

You’re welcomed to you a priori opinion-

[[I am a science by training and profession. So is TXnMA. Do you think that it maybe, just might be possible that what we write has a little more credibility than the musings of someone without science training?]]

Not when it relies on assumptions that defy the science- but again- you’re welcome to your a priori beleif that defies the evidnece- let’s just not pretend it’s anythign else shall we?