Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SvenMagnussen

He met with the Justices of the Supreme Court the other day, and the pic I saw of it was all smilin’, laughin’, jokin’ around.

He’s got them in his hip pocket.


11 posted on 01/29/2009 2:04:34 PM PST by brewcrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: brewcrew

I can think of at least 4 he doesn’t have. You’re seeing “smiles” because cameras were there and the conservative justices are, if nothing else, gracious.

Wanna see how they really feel - next hear at Zero’s State of the Union Show - keep your eye on the justices in the front row. The justices usually do not applaud during the SOTU Show - but watch Scalia’s face - when Clinton gave his SOTU, it was fixed in an almost permanent scowel - as if Scalia couldn’t stand sitting that close to him.


21 posted on 01/29/2009 2:16:20 PM PST by Right Cal Gal (Abraham Lincoln would have let Berkeley leave the Union without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: brewcrew
He wants you to think: He’s got them in his hip pocket.

T SCOTUS said no cameras no press. He brought his own photographer, posed the pictures and released them to the press. He's all smiles leaning on the back of the CJ's chair with the appearance that all is well....

THINK. He just did the opposite of what the SCOTUS had laid down as rules and then spit in their collective faces....Looks at their body language: crossed arms, no smiles or strained smiles.....He may have just opened himself to a sum of their WA!

27 posted on 01/29/2009 2:22:59 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: brewcrew

Samuel Alito was not at that meeting. Alito was the asst then U.S. Attorney for NJ. He has experience in prosecuting criminals and organized crime.

This is one of the first responses they have made in a case that I have seen. I think the military plaintiffs should be a concern for them.

Also someone posted a message here about Obama requiring the military starting in July to make their oath to the office of the president and not the Constitution. The message was locked by Jim??

Dr. Orly Taitz is planning a military case with at least 50 plaintiffs. She needs to get about 100,000 or more so SCOTUS or Obama can tell the U.S. military they have no standing.

Yeah just go get killed on the battlefield but you have no protection under The Constitution. We are not serfs.

I still think SCOTUS will do something but if not - send up military plaintiff cases on a weekly basis.


44 posted on 01/29/2009 2:35:29 PM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson