Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boxen
I don’t know. But I do know that life existed in the past. And that the populations of life that existed in the past are different from those that exist now. Explain to me again why a “hot primordial soup” is necessary to explain that change.

But of course life existed in the past. Any serious Bible student can demonstrate that is the literal WORD. Different of course, different 'age' than this present one, Peter says himself there are three different heaven/earth ages.

The recently discovered 'hot' primordial soup' is NOT my claim, but I cannot read anything or watch any so called science show without the preface always being about a single cell getting hot and bothered and reproducing itself into wallla us today.

But none on FR who push their scientific methodology will admit any connection as though they are ashamed to the well published claims.

96 posted on 01/26/2009 11:26:45 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: Just mythoughts
"But of course life existed in the past. Any serious Bible student can demonstrate that is the literal WORD. Different of course, different 'age' than this present one, Peter says himself there are three different heaven/earth ages."

I'm sorry, but I can't see how this has anything to do with the ToE.

"I cannot read anything or watch any so called science show without the preface always being about a single cell getting hot and bothered and reproducing itself into wallla us today.

But none on FR who push their scientific methodology will admit any connection as though they are ashamed to the well published claims."

There is a connection, but it isn't as important as you might think. A "hot primordial soup"--as you refer to it--is not NECESSARY to the Theory of Evolution. Read that word again: "Necessary." Life began. The scientific consensus regarding this beginning is tenuous right now. Life CHANGED. The Theory of Evolution explains that change. The invalidation of a "hot primordial soup" would not invalidate the ToE.

As you are convinced of its necessity, explain to me, through logical proof or argument, how the invalidation of a "hot primordial soup" means the invalidation of the ToE. Convince me of its indispensability.


112 posted on 01/26/2009 11:52:03 AM PST by Boxen (There is no wealth like knowledge, no poverty like ignorance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson