How does a thousand times a thousand hoaxes, distortions and lies make a "scientific" theory?
“How does a thousand times a thousand hoaxes, distortions and lies make a “scientific” theory?”
Citations?
Remember. You only posted a small number of paleontological hoaxes. And even one example that wasn’t a hoax or misidentification.
You listed, what, 4 hoaxes? All of which were quickly debunked (by scientists, not creationists, BTW).
distortions and lies
What distortions and lies are you talking about?
And you never answered my question.
How does a thousand times a thousand hoaxes, distortions and lies make a "scientific" theory?
I challenge you to name five frauds or hoaxes in the field of human evolution/fossil man. And I'll spot you the first one--Piltdown Man.
If there are "a thousand times a thousand hoaxes" you should be able to come up with just four more.
How does a thousand times a thousand hoaxes, distortions and lies make a "scientific" theory?
I challenge you to name five frauds or hoaxes in the field of human evolution/fossil man. And I'll spot you the first one--Piltdown Man.
If there are "a thousand times a thousand hoaxes" you should be able to come up with just four more.