I’m very confused. This is a joke, right? Rush knows as well as I do, that he and Obama will never be teaming up on a stim. package. Listening to him, however, I’m getting the feeling he’s serious. Also, it would never work. If the economy boomed, how would you be able to tell which part of the plan was responsible? I know, and you know, that the tax cuts would be responsible, but O and his maggots would insist that it was bridge building that did it. How to prove who was right? There can be no argument on this point, btw, because WE HAVE ALREADY IN THIS COUNTRY DONE THIS EXPERIMENT A HUNDRED TIMES. We cut taxes, the econ. booms, and the very next time a recession comes around, Wash. goes crazy over the question of tax cuts vs. gov. stimulus. Rush’s experiement would be absolutely, utterly, completely, and totally forgotten when the next recession hit. Just like all our past tax cutting experiments.
Welcome to FR
Rush playing clip of SanFranNan saying how contraception saves costs.
Pelosi is suggesting that fewer human beings stimulates the economy.
(The Botox must be reaching the brain cells-my comment, not Rush’s)
The unequal distribution of...capitalism, around the world...
Brilliant, Rush!