To: FreeAtlanta
I spoke to the Supreme Court Justice in my state who advised that the US Supreme Court have been ordered to throw out any case that deal with the fraud President elect.This is obviously BS.
3 posted on
01/25/2009 8:41:45 PM PST by
Arguendo
To: Arguendo
I would agree that this must be BS but it does seem strange that the SC hasn’t apparently taken any of these cases seriously. You’d think that in a gesture of openness and honesty that BO would disclose his real BC rather than hire lawyers to keep it sealed.
Wonder what Laura Ingraham has to say about this....she worked at the SC.
6 posted on
01/25/2009 8:48:21 PM PST by
Aria
("An America that could elect Sarah Palin might still save itself." Vin Suprynowicz)
To: Arguendo
What a brazenly irrational assumption.
THAT PRESUMES
that you have covered 100% OF ALL THE POSSIBLE INVESTIGATIVE BASES
PROVING
that the State Supreme Court justice in question had no personal nor professional links nor associations from which to collect such information.
What an absurd assumption.
9 posted on
01/25/2009 8:52:57 PM PST by
Quix
(LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
To: Arguendo
This is obviously BS. No, think Vince Foster (on a somewhat grander scale).
64 posted on
01/26/2009 1:41:02 AM PST by
SteveH
(First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.)
To: Arguendo
BS? Maybe. But so is the Usurper’s biography.
76 posted on
01/26/2009 5:52:21 AM PST by
Scanian
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson