Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Arguendo

What a brazenly irrational assumption.

THAT PRESUMES

that you have covered 100% OF ALL THE POSSIBLE INVESTIGATIVE BASES

PROVING

that the State Supreme Court justice in question had no personal nor professional links nor associations from which to collect such information.

What an absurd assumption.


9 posted on 01/25/2009 8:52:57 PM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Quix

No one can “order” the United States Supreme Court to throw out a case. It’s constitutionally impossible.

If you knew anything about the structure of government you would know this to be true. Since you obviously don’t, why don’t you take this as a learning opportunity.


21 posted on 01/25/2009 9:39:37 PM PST by Arguendo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson