[squidly]

the US Supreme Court have been ordered to throw out any case that deal with the fraud President elect

Ordered by whom? I wasn't aware of a person to whom they had to answer.

[Arguendo]

I spoke to the Supreme Court Justice in my state who advised that the US Supreme Court have been ordered to throw out any case that deal with the fraud President elect.

This is obviously BS.

[jeffc]

Why do kids have to submit a BC to play sports in high school?

[Quix]

Thanks for the confirmation.

That’s what I’ve been asserting for some weeks.

There’s no other explanation.

The Oligarchy that vets the Supreme candidates to begin with has obviously given them their orders . . . perhaps even under pain of threat of death . . . perhaps for their entire families as well.

It’s their style.

Something’s very strange when in AUGUST

history text books in Britain took out or reduced to a paragraph stuff about George Washington et al . . . and added

SIXTEEN PAGES

ABOUT OTHUGA.

The Oligarchy must be slobbering at their mouths with rabid glee over rushing us into the global system via Othuga.

[TheConservativeParty]

The Obama Furher does not need to show any paperwork. He is The Furher, and not to be questioned.

Can’t wait until this fraud is exposed! So many things he has hidden from his adoring masses...The truth always comes out in the end. His fall from liberal grace will be so satisfying to see.

Someday, the real Kenyan BC or the sealed Hawaiian BC (which probably shows the birthplace as Kenya)will surface. Someone is going to want to break the story to the world. They will offer up a reward so big, someone will cough up the BC. Oh, I hope it’s sooner rather than later.

[stockstrader]

Let's see here, the Chief Justice had Hussein take the oath of office again the next day as an 'overabundance of caution'.

Why no ‘overabundance of caution’ from the Chief Justice when it comes to his Constitutional qualifications?

[stockstrader]

Why no ‘overabundance of caution’ from the Chief Justice when it comes to his Constitutional qualifications?

'Overabundance' meaning producing a birth certificate.

[Rome2000]

You can't get a job that requires even low level security clearance in the Government without providing a GENUINE not photocopied birth certificate with raised seal, a SS Card or passport,and Selective Service registration number.

And then you have to pass a background investigation.

[Red Steel]

I spoke to the Supreme Court Justice in my state who advised that the US Supreme Court have been ordered to throw out any case that deal with the fraud President elect.

Who ordered? Obama told them not to? Pelosi? Bush? Reid?

[dianed]

Thank you for posting your concerns, it has lead to a lively debate.

It looks as if you have a lot of company.

[real_patriotic_american]

As an American citizen, I DEMAND to know who ordered SCOTUS to throw out any Obama non-citizenship case and then have the situation investigated.

[nbhunt]

May be BS...but there is crap going on that no one can understand why. And I do believe it runs deeper than SCOTUS. Say and think what you want..... but I have been told for many many years that SCOTUS nor the President runs this country, by very intellectual people in different branches of the armed forces. Now I'm beginng to think maybe so.

[SteveH]

Here is some grist from the California Elections Code, Division 6, Part 1, Ch. 1 (Democrat Party), Ch. 3 (Selection of Candidates by the Secretary of State).

(Note: in California, the appearance of presidential candidate names on the presidential primary ballot is determined by the California Secretary of State. They are unable to tell people exactly what they do when people call them-- at least, not immediately. The procedure for determination is (somewhat surprisingly) not spelled out in the code either. Concerned individuals can call Maxine at the California Secretary of State's office in Sacramento, (916) 657-2166. Maxine tells callers that it is up to the Democrat Party in California to ensure that the Democratic candidates are Constitutionally qualified; but Chris at the California Democrat Party, (916) 422-5707, tells callers that his office did not have anything to do with putting Barack Obama's name on the California primary ballot, as far as he is aware, and refers callers to the California Secretary of State office and the California Elections Code. It is interesting that the candidate has to file an affidavit to get his or her name off the ballot but nothing in the code itself specifies nothing that he or she has to file to get his or her name on the ballot. )

6040. This article shall apply to the designation of candidates by the Secretary of State for placement only on the presidential primary ballot.

6041. The Secretary of State shall place the name of a candidate upon the presidential primary ballot when he or she has determined that the candidate is generally advocated for or recognized throughout the United States or California as actively seeking the nomination of the Democratic Party for President of the United States. The Secretary of State shall include as criteria for selecting candidates the fact of qualifying for funding under the Federal Elections Campaign Act of 1974, as amended. Between the 150th day and the 63rd day preceding a presidential primary election, the Secretary of State shall publicly announce and distribute to the news media for publication a list of the selected candidates that he or she intends to place on the ballot at the following presidential primary election. After the 63rd day preceding a presidential primary election, the Secretary of State may add candidates to the selection, but he or she may not delete any presidential candidate whose name appears on the announced list except as provided in Section 6043.

6042. When the Secretary of State decides to place the name of a candidate on the ballot pursuant to Section 6041, he or she shall notify the candidate that the candidate's name will appear on the ballot of this state in the presidential primary election. The secretary shall also notify the candidate that the candidate may withdraw his or her name from the list of recognized candidates by filing with the Secretary of State an affidavit pursuant to Section 6043 no later than the 60th day before the presidential primary election.

6043. If a selected candidate or an unselected candidate files with the Secretary of State, no later than the time specified in Section 6042, an affidavit stating without qualification that he or she is not now a candidate for the office of President of the United States, and stating that similar documents, also without qualification, have been or will be timely filed, where applicable, with the appropriate public election official in all other states holding open presidential primaries, that candidate's name shall be omitted from the list of names certified by the Secretary of State to the county elections officials for the ballot and his or her name shall not appear on the ballot.

[john mirse]

I wonder how future historians will judge key people in this Obama 2008 presidential eligibility fiasco.

I’m sorry, but I can’t help but think that future historians will be awfully cruel to people like Congresswoman Pelosi and the members of the Supreme Court who—for strange reasons known only to themselves—sacrificed the integrity of the Constitution of the United States in order to allow a person to be sworn in as president who presented NO legal evidence whatsoever that he was even eligible to become President of the United States.

I can’t help but feel so sorry for future members of the Pelosi family and for the families of the present members of the Supreme Court who will have to face the public’s eternal outrage over the fact that an IN-eligible person—-IN-eligible according to the laws of the Constitution—–was allowed to be sworn in as President of the United States on Jan. 20, 2009.