The fact that you would support such a left wing traitorous cut-and-run, baby killing candidate such as Gillibrand in a "heart-beat" is sickening. The Democrats who have produced this Gillibrand-is-a-conservative scam are laughing their asses off -- at dupes such as you.
Apprently you're not even reading my posts now, since I specifically stated that I would NOT vote for Gillibrand in the general election, citing the fact she's pro-abortion. I did suggest freepers crossover and vote for her in the RAT primary, because it's far preferable to have a Dem who is right 10% of the time (Gillibrand), and those 10% being issues of major importance to conservatives (gun rights, bailout, immigration, etc.), than a total moonbat like McCarthy who is right 0% of the time. Yes, between two baby killing candidates (McCarthy and Gillbrand), I will take the one who is right on guns, immigration, and spending, rather than let the baby killer who is a total marxist win.
I stand by my claim that the only MAJOR issue where King is significantly to the right of Gillibrand is abortion. On several other MAJOR issues, she is to the right of him. He might be better on many minor non-hot button issues that the ACU rates him on year after year (something like "Voted YES on allowing pro-ANWR license plates in the district of Columbia"), but in the grand scheme of things, Gillibrand far outshines your backstabbing, terrorist loving RINO scumbag.
Also, the fact you refer to Gillibrand as a "traitorous cut-and-run" candidate shows me you really haven't researched where she stands on the issues (and likely don't care), given the fact she was the only Dem in the entire NY delegation to vote WITH Bush on the WOT.
Enjoy your RINO Peter King. Just don't come crying to me when SOS Hillary wreaks this nation with her latest socialist scheme and your RINO is standing behind her cheering him on. At least when Gillibrand is voting with liberal Democrats she's honest enough to run as a RAT and doesn't pretend to be "one of us".
Freepers like you are part of the problem. I do enjoy watching all the idiot "conservatives" in Florida who cheered on Mel Martinez's in the Florida primary get their just desserts though. Vote Republican In Name Only, get Republican In Name Only.
I NEVER said I'm supporting Gillibrand. Show me where I said I'd vote for her in the general election. I said hypothetically she'd get my vote IF she a was pro-life and pro-family candidate (which she is NOT), I'd vote for her in a heartbeat, but of course she's not so there's no way I'd vote for her.
This will be my final reply to you, since you ignore the actual statements listed in my posts and substitute your own nonsense garbage that I'm endorsing Democrats. Kristin Gillibrand is no way, shape, or form a conservative. Your terrorist loving IRA shrill Peter King is simply SO incredibly bad that even she's more ethical than him and better on most issues of MAJOR importance to conservatives. That is a fact. Sure, King votes the "party line" on 75% of the run of the mill issue the ACU rates him on (stuff like "motion to recommittee an amendment to H.R. 343 on endorsing the George W. Bush declaration celebrating the use of Intelligent Design in Minnesota", but he was neverthless WRONG on the big stuff like the bailout and gun rights, whereas Gillibrand was RIGHT. You should be a spokesman for Dick Durbin, he used similar logic to claim Kerry was the most "pro-Catholic" candidate because Kerry had supported the Catholic church on all their minor obscure policies, eve though he was dead wrong on every major thing they held dear.
Your produced a nice, cherry picked, laundry list of all the liberal crap Gillibrand voted for. And why not? She was running as a Democrat. At least she's honest about it Your buddy Peter King is running as a "Republican", but I could just as easily produce a cherry picked, laundry list of all the liberal garbage he supported from 2007-2008. I could easily name 30 times he stabbed conservatives in the back. He wouldn't have lasted one day on a conservative forum, given his non-stop shrilling for Giuliani and bitter attacks on Fred Thompson. There's no use though in bothering though. Peter King aiding and abetting bloody-thristy Irish terrorists who murder innocent civilians is even worse than Gillibrand's support of abortion on demand, but you don't care because that POS Peter King has all the important "R" next to his name on the ballot. Those who put party above all else are the real traitors to American justice. You'd probably vote for Adolf Hitler if he had an R next to his name.
If Gillibrand were as bad as you say she is, the liberal base wouldn't be tearing their hair out at her appointment. They claim Harry Reid is "conservative" too, but not one "progressive" went nuts with Reid's election. They ARE going nuts over Gillibrand, because she's simply not as far left as the average NY Dem. The liberal equivilent of the ACU, namely the ADA, said she OPPOSED them 30% of the time, so the leading liberal advocacy group in this nation refutes your statement that she is rated "95% liberal".
The Republicans have who have produced this King-is-a-conservative scam are laughing their asses off -- at dupes such as you. Conservatives like you continue to ensure the GOP is run by RINOs, because your word means nothing. You will not only support this scumbag to prevent a baby-killer from winning, but you'll also vote for him in the primary over a real Republican because you drink the "only RINOs can win!!!" kool-aid. Therefore the only one on this forum who will cast a vote to put a liberal in office over a conservative Republican is you, despite all your lies to the contrary.
Go ahead and vote for King, it won't make any difference because "electable moderate" Peter King is going to lose to Gillibrand in a landslide. Procedual party-line votes aside, when it comes to their core values they're both moderate Democrats, the only differnece is Gillibrand is honest about it.