We are getting 24/25 mpg in the Tacoma.
The Ford Ranger is still sitting on the same 1980 chassis and suspension (with a couple of modifications) as the original 1980 Ranger. You can literally drop the current Ranger body on top of a 1980 Ranger frame and it will bolt up with the exception of (IIRC) one or two body bolts.
Handling and ride are pretty much straight from 1980 as well. It’s nowhere near as “car-like” to drive as the Toyota Tacoma or even the GM Canyon/Colorado twins.
They also have the usual run of “UAW-induced” flaws.
Sure, the 2.3L Ranger is the most fuel-efficient small truck on the market, along with its twin, the Mazda B2300 2.3L, but the 2.3L truck is gutless. Better to get the 2.7L Toyota Tacoma which is only 1 mpg less in the city, ties it in highway, and has more power (143hp/154lb-ft of torque for the Ranger, 157/180 for the Tacoma - and with trucks, torque is king.)