MOST normally functioning, moral, humans with ANY compassion whatsoever for children would think ONE "picture of the pair engaging in sexual activity" would be enough to justify her escaping her tormentor by whatever means she saw fit. But since MOST of them were "of just the accused", a CHILD at the time the pictures were taken, this guy seems to think it's somehow A-O-K.
Earth to prosecutor!!! SOMEONE had to TAKE those picture "of just the accused".
What a loser a-hole this guy is.
You brought up another point, something that I have learned is a common occurrence with women of no moral compass:
They’d rather let their kids be abused by the step-father or boyfriend than to “lose him”.
If you read some of the articles on lifenews and lifesitenews, you’ll come across abortion anecdotes regularly where the “boyfriend” raped the daughter, but the “mother” didn’t want to “lose him” by turning him in for rape.
And if you brought this situation up to a “pro-choicer”, they’d DEFEND IT. Seriously.
Someone needs to tie crown prosecutor Mark Gamble to a chair with “cable ties and towels” and beat a little sense into him. God help this poor girl.
The next work of pedophiles is far reaching. There is a website in Australia that proports that the network includes, judges, police, social workers etc. And these pople work to suppress reports of this type of behaviour.