Replies

Yes, it’s only a small part of what Polarik has been saying. The guy that I was tallking to basically thinks that I read Polarik’s analysis and nothing else before making a determination. I tried to explain that I had come to that decision myself outside of Polarik’s analysis. He didn’t really care. He wants to hear testimony under oath. Hopefully we all will hear testimony under oath at some point. (Whether that testimony comes from Polarik or other expert witnesses, that image isn’t from a real document - period.)

Just FYI - before I came to FR I was following and commenting on Polarik’s analysis through TexasDarlin’s blog and the Atlas Shrugs blog. IIRC there was another imaging specialist named “techdude” that Polarik blew out of the water. The details are a bit fuzzy at this point - there has been so much discussion since then.

In the end, Polarik will be proved right.

Yup, that Techdude blowout happened when I was on vacation. I tried to reconstruct the story... it was actually Dr. Krawetz who figured out that Techdude was impersonating a guy named Fink... and then posted it, figuring I was the one behind the curve. It turns out this escaped the notice of a lot of FReepers and even today, folks will say, “Techdude was a fraud”? I was disappointed because Techdude was the one who supposedly found Maya’s information on the electronic CoLB posted by fightthesmears.

Testimony under oath from Barry Obama will not be reliable on the face of it since he has perjured himself in the past. Documentation will be necessary to verify anything the man says. He is a lying fraud who has skated through life as an affirmative action recipient gaming the systems of pasport applications, college entry, educational funding and now elected office. He has been seated in the Illinois legislature despite the fact that he lied on his Bar application. He has sworn to uphold the U.S. Constitution--in order to sit in the U.S. Senate--yet may be guilty of doing just the opposite by presenting himself eligible using fraudulent documents.

Testimony under oath will mean nothing to Barack Hussein Obama. He is the epitome of amoral relativism, demanding to be allowed to ascend to the office of president without proving he is Constitutionally eligible, and his sycophants working FR will immediately spew the 'why should he be made to do that which other presidents have not been made to do' crap which is nothing more spohisticated than stealth racism. This man is disgusting.

Yes, it’s only a small part of what Polarik has been saying

Yes, that was the first thing I said when I saw the Daily Kos COLB. Then came the hard part: proving it. Confirmation is always a good thing. Just FYI - before I came to FR I was following and commenting on Polarik’s analysis through TexasDarlin’s blog and the Atlas Shrugs blog. IIRC there was another imaging specialist named “techdude” that Polarik blew out of the water. The details are a bit fuzzy at this point - there has been so much discussion since then.

I think I remember you. TechDude tried to pass off the 2008 COLB border as being the same as the 2006 and 2007. When I got my hands on a real 2007 COLB, and found that it resembled Obama's COLB, the jig was up.