Replies

Horowitz completely misses the point. He says that five Justices on the SCOTUS shouldn't be allowed to overrule the voice of 64 million voters.

What if a significant portion of that 64 million would never have voted for Obama in the first place if they knew what we now know about him?

Just like a spouse can have a marriage annulled if the other spouse is unable or unwilling to consummate the marriage, so too can we have this election annulled because Obama is clearly unable (and unwilling) to consummate this union.

I don't care how many people came to the wedding or how much the parents paid for the wedding ... if I'm not getting any ... um, documentation ... the marriage never happened. It is that simple.

Horowitz completely misses the point. He says that five Justices on the SCOTUS shouldn't be allowed to overrule the voice of 64 million voters.

The 20th Amendment clearly anticipated the possibility that millions of people would have voted for someone not Constitutionally eligible to be President.

. . . if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.

No birth certificate, no White House; or no Constitution.

ML/NJ