To: freedumb2003
The law really does forbid substituted judgment. Look it up.
I am not the one promoting the nanny state. You are the one advocating the government deciding that some lives are not worth living.
32 posted on
01/08/2009 10:45:06 PM PST by
BykrBayb
(May God have mercy on our souls. ~ Þ)
To: BykrBayb
I am not the one promoting the nanny state. You are the one advocating the government deciding that some lives are not worth living. I am saying the immediate family (not the extended family) should decide. The government's role should be only in determining who is "immediate family."
As it did, properly, in this case.
33 posted on
01/08/2009 10:51:02 PM PST by
freedumb2003
(Der neuen Fuhrer: AKA the Murdering Messiah: Keep your powder dry, folks)
To: BykrBayb
The law really does forbid substituted judgment. Look it up. Not sure what I should look up. If you are brain-dead and there is no "substituted judgment" then who is allowed to make decisions on your behalf?
34 posted on
01/08/2009 10:53:06 PM PST by
freedumb2003
(Der neuen Fuhrer: AKA the Murdering Messiah: Keep your powder dry, folks)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson