[advertising guy]

we all understand your anger but to use that anger against Rush on the Rush thread is boneheaded on your part

[Nephi]

we all understand your anger but to use that anger against Rush on the Rush thread is boneheaded on your part

My anger? You don't have a dog in this fight?

Where should I comment on the refusal to address a looming constitutional crisis by the self-described "American's conservative anchorman?" On a Glenn Beck thread?

[chuckles]

I love Rush as much as anybody but he made the decision to leave the BC topic alone. We have NOBODY of any consequence talking about it. If not Rush, who? Levin?, Coulter? Anybody? Coulter is on her latest "controversial" book tour. Does anybody really think she is scared to say anything about anything? She could bring it up and get everybody's panties in a knot.

I also love Bush, but I think everyone would cough at the mention of amnesty, the wall, prescription plans, etc. I still would vote for Bush over Kerry even today, but wrong is wrong no matter who does it. I still love Rush, but it's not right to let underlings do the heavy lifting. If all we can get is an occasional headline on WND, we won't ever get traction. Even if Rush wanted to make fun of the BC'ers, it would at least get people thinking on the subject. It makes you wonder where Rush would be if the case had a breakthrough. Would he glom on to what others had done, or still ignore it?