Posted on 01/05/2009 4:12:21 PM PST by MplsSteve
Dear Supporter,
As you may have read or heard by now, today the Minnesota State Canvassing Board met and made their determination in the U.S. Senate Recount, effectively proving that the only declaration coming today is one of an inaccurate count.
There are a number of problems with the total certified today, including double counted votes, over 650 potentially wrongly rejected absentee votes, resulting in the disenfranchising of Minnesota voters and jeopardizing the integrity of Minnesota's election system.
Harry Reid and national Democrats have now publicly said they will try to seat Al Franken tomorrow when the 111th Congress convenes and new members are sworn in. This action, the very first action of the 111th Congress and the new Democrat leadership that campaigned on a theme of bipartisanship, will result in an historic political power play done at the behest of Al Franken. Minnesotans have the right to elect their own elected officials, just like every other state in the country, and this stunning move by Al Franken and Harry Reid strips Minnesotans of that right.
Please click here to help us continue to fight to ensure that every valid vote counts.
Coleman for Senate counsel Tony Trimble made the following statement this afternoon, raising the serious concerns our campaign has raised consistently during the recount process, and signaling our intent to file an election contest within the next 24 hours:
The actions today by the Canvassing Board are but the first step in what, unfortunately, will now have to be a longer process. This process isn't at the end; it is now just at the beginning.
We will contest the results of the Canvassing Board -- otherwise, literally millions of Minnesotans will be disenfranchised.
While we appreciate the effort of this board to do the work, the reality is that any certification of vote totals at this point is only preliminary. As this Canvassing Board has recognized, there still exist serious problems with inconsistencies in the administrative recount, and therefore in the validity and reliability of the numbers certified today.
There can be no count that is accurate or valid when 654 potentially valid absentee votes remain disenfranchised and when some votes are counted twice - leading to a violation of one of the most sacred principles of our constitution - "One person, One vote."
And, there can be no justification to report out a total when 133 votes were included in a count where there are not ballots to support them. Or when a batch of votes were not counted on Election Night, but were miraculously "found" during the recount and included.
If the Canvassing Board had resolved all these issues, then the process might be completed. But the Board has deferred the resolution of those issues for the contest phase provided for in Minnesota law.
Since the process is far from complete, there can be no confidence in the current results of the United States Senate Recount, and we will file a contest within the next 24 hours to promptly correct those problems and inaccuracies. The Supreme Court ruling today also emphasizes that that's what we must do to provide an accurate count for this election.
Senator Coleman is adamant that we not wait a moment longer than necessary to ensure that the election be completed with accuracy and validity - and most importantly, without disenfranchising Minnesota voters or having a cloud remain over the results.
The utter lack of uniformity in the treatment of rejected absentee ballots, resulting in the disenfranchising of voters, is perhaps the most troublesome aspect of the recount.
Similar ballots were treated differently by different counties. This creates an Equal Protection violation that fatally taints any result that includes these ballots.
This was precisely what the Minnesota Supreme Court order said to avoid.
Unfortunately, with this announcement today, numerous Minnesotans will be wrongly disenfranchised because their votes are not counted. Mr. Franken and his campaign for purely political reasons no longer want to "count all the votes".
And, it is with great disappointment that we've seen senior members of the Secretary of State's Office contributing to the process being broken.
When senior members of the Secretary of State's office, charged with ensuring a fair and balanced process, engage in acts which undermine that neutrality, all of us must be concerned.
The fact is the Canvassing Board's current totals are invalid and unreliable because:
· Original and duplicate ballots have been double counted - even members of the Canvassing Board acknowledge this is a serious issue, yet nothing was resolved - instead, double counted votes were simply added to their recount totals.
· Newly discovered ballots, which appeared for the first time during the recount and are included in the Canvassing Board totals without proper reconciliation to the number of voters signed into the precincts on Election Day.
· Missing ballots supposedly tallied on election night that could not be found during the recount process are included in the Canvassing Board count contrary to Minnesota precedent.
· And again, an inconsistent treatment of challenged ballots - an inconsistent treatment of wrongfully rejected absentee ballots - and an inconsistent treatment of the campaign by the very office charged with coordinating this recount simply results in a process that is broken.
The recount was supposed to be a recount - fair and reasoned - and one that would retain the credibility of the outcome of this election.
However, it ceased being that the day that duplicate ballots and "missing ballots" were included in the count, and simply became more and more broken each and every day.
We had hoped that the board would refrain from reporting out with unanimity a recount total today. Since that did not happen, we will file an election contest within the next 24 hours.
It will be based upon the issues I have outlined, as well as the lack of inclusion of 654 additional ballots that we believe should be a part of this recount and the very serious issue of included double counted votes that disenfranchises Minnesotans.
Our goal and obligation should be to get an accurate and valid vote as quickly as possible, and that is our reason for acting with urgency. Minnesotans ought to be able to expect that an accurate and valid recount would have ensured two United States Senators from Minnesota tomorrow. However, because the process is broken that will not happen.
We strongly believe that every valid vote must be counted. We have called for that principle to be the basis of this entire recount process, and we will not stop now. We firmly believe that once that happens, just like on election night, Norm Coleman will have the most votes in this close race, and be re-elected to the United States Senate. We know- all too well- that it has been a long road, and we value your friendship, advice and support throughout the campaign and recount.
We need your continued help as we move forward with an election contest to ensure the sanctity of Minnesota's election process. Please click here to continue supporting our efforts, and to help us maintain a strong, knowledgeable and skilled team carrying this effort forward.
BAHAAHAAHAAAHAAAHAAAA!!!!!
Okay, I'm done...
Coleman votes conservative 73% of the time. Franken will most likely vote conservative 0% of this time. The two are not equally liberal as you would suggest. In fact it isn't even close.
Last time I looked, unlike what you suggest, the senate votes are public and not behind ones back.
If you wish to rationalize that the stealing of an election by a balls-to-the-wall leftwinger from a 73% conservative is okay, you should try some other argument.
If it were up to an actual Conservative who recognized Democrats for what they are and was willing to fight to the death, our chances would be near 100% of winning. Unfortunately, we don't have one of those. All we have is Coleman.
Aw karaaap.
But they still don’t have a filibuster-proof senate majority, correct?
So this matters little, also correct?
Gee Sen Coleman, now you decide to fight back? During the recounts you stopped contesting how many hundreds of votes so you could appear to be Mr Nice Guy. You know what they say about Nice Guys..... they end up losing to Franken... to Obama...
At least 35 states are permanently lost to conservatism. Of course, MN is near the top of such a list.
Do you think God “allowed” this, or was it the free will choice of the fallen American people?
Not as long as it can be filibustered. McConnell has already said the GOP will do his.
As a lifelong Minnesotan I am embarrassed for my state, furious at the cavalier attitude our liberal officials have for a correct count, and absolutely white-hot pi**ed off at the idiots who voted for Stuart Freaking Smalley and made this a contest in the first place.
Nobaba888, have you ever heard of Senators Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins? Both Republicans and annually receive wonderful pieces written about them by the Boston Globe, NYT, and other great bastions of the media. They're RINOs, and do that "filibuster-proof senate majority" is more likely than you think.
How many other RINO Senators are there out there, aside from Snowe... and Collins... oh, and McCain....
God speed to you Norm Coleman.
Well, there's Arlen Specter (Rino-PA)...
The American public has reached a point where they are tired of conservative rule. If you think about we did have a nice run. Conservatives held the White House from 1981 to 1993 and then 2001-2009. The American Right held Congress from 1995 to 2007. The American people have decided it is time to try something new. Despite being shut of out power, I am optimistic that we will rebound.
For evidence look to Canada and the UK. The Tories of both the UK and Canada were declared dead parties in the 1990’s. But in Oct 2007, Canada elected a conservative coalition govt. Next year, the UK is ready to elect a conservative Prime Minister. So we will comeback. What we need to do in the wilderness is learn to better relate to people who don’t listen to Rush or Hannity. In others words, convince non believers of the merits of cosnervativism.
Q: How is a Chavez (Ven.)-run election differ from a Dem Party-run election?
A: Nothing. Massive fraud is s.o.p. in both.
“....The American public has reached a point where they are tired of conservative rule. If you think about we did have a nice run. Conservatives held the White House from 1981 to 1993 and then 2001-2009. The American Right held Congress from 1995 to 2007. The American people have decided it is time to try something new....”
Ha ha ha ha! Bush a Conservative? Ha ha ha ha! Guffaw! Wheeze. You are killing me! Ha ha ha ha!
You clearly are no Conservative as you clearly don’t know what one is when you have delusions about how Conservatives have been running things 2001-09, etc.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
