To: hedgetrimmer
Where did he say that?Paul gave this statement:
He went on to challenge the idea of Hamas threatening Israel's security and argued that "Palestinian missiles are so minor compared to the fire power of Israel, who has nuclear weapons."
It makes Paul a terrorist apologist and justifies use of less powerful weapons.
I used to admire Paul, but he is no longer for liberty, he now preaches submission.
Him first.
83 posted on
01/05/2009 12:56:38 PM PST by
Navy Patriot
(John McCain, the Manchurian Candidate, makes a Marxist President.)
To: Navy Patriot
..but he is no longer for liberty, he now preaches submission.. Many of us have been trying to point out that this is not new from him.. you can find statements like these going back to the late 70s from Paul.
84 posted on
01/05/2009 12:59:27 PM PST by
mnehring
To: Navy Patriot
The writer of the article made this statement, the quote is not from the context of Mr. Paul's actual comments.
It makes Paul a terrorist apologist and justifies use of less powerful weapons.
You're a Navy vet? When did you serve? I ask because if you were active duty during Desert Storm you would have seen the Bush administration halt the war against Iraq after the 'highway of death' incident. Why did he do that and leave such a dangerous dictator in power?
Clinton executed the war in Kosovo from 20,000 feet. He bombed the infrastructure into vapor. The media was careful not to report civilian casualties.
Next, the current Iraq war has been executed with boots on the ground as opposed to leveling massive firepower against the Iraqis and finishing it off quickly. Why did GW Bush execute the war in this fashion? It is certain that American casualties have been higher because of this strategy.
Given the Bush Clinton Bush policies of the last 24 years, how is what Mr. Paul is saying, is different than what these presidents executed?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson