Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi Erases Gingrich's Long-Standing Fairness Rules
Human Events ^ | 5 January 2009 | Connie Hair

Posted on 01/05/2009 7:54:23 AM PST by Clinton's a liar

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi plans to re-write House rules today to ensure that the Republican minority is unable to have any influence on legislation. Pelosi’s proposals are so draconian, and will so polarize the Capitol, that any thought President-elect Obama has of bipartisan cooperation will be rendered impossible before he even takes office.

Pelosi’s rule changes -- which may be voted on today -- will reverse the fairness rules that were written around Newt Gingrich’s “Contract with America.”

In reaction, the House Republican leadership is sending a letter today to Pelosi to object to changes to House Rules this week that would bar Republicans from offering alternative bills, amendments to Democrat bills or even the guarantee of open debate accessible by motions to recommit for any piece of legislation during the entire 111th Congress. These procedural abuses, as outlined in the below letter obtained by HUMAN EVENTS, would also include the repeal of six-year limit for committee chairmen and other House Rules reform measures enacted in 1995 as part of the Contract with America.

[TEXT OF LETTER AT LINK]

(Excerpt) Read more at humanevents.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 111th; agenda; america2point0; bho2008; congress; cultureofcorruption; demcultofcorruption; democratcongress; democratparty; democrats; democratscandals; dictatorship; fairness; fascism; gingrich; house; liberalfascism; liberals; newt; ninepercentnancy; pelosi; rats; rino; rinos; rules; sitdownandshutup; starkravingsocialism; thedemonazisgotowork; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 341 next last
To: Domandred

It is time for someone to begin paraphrasing something like this for the King and Queen of the Legislative Branch:

Olive Branch Petition:
Approved by the Continental Congress on July 5, 1775
To the King’s Most Excellent Majesty. Most Gracious Sovereign,

We your Majesty’s faithful subjects of the colonies of New-hampshire, Massachusetts-bay, Rhode island and Providence plantations, Connecticut, New-York, New-Jersey, Pennsylvania, the counties of New Castle, Kent, and Sussex on Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina, in behalf of ourselves and the inhabitants of these colonies, who have deputed us to represent them in general Congress, entreat your Majesty’s gracious attention to this our humble petition.

The union between our Mother Country and these colonies, and the energy of mild and just government, produced benefits so remarkably important, and afforded such an assurance of their permanency and increase, that the wonder and envy of other Nations were excited, while they beheld Great Britain riseing to a power the most extraordinary the world had ever known.

Her rivals observing, that there was no probability of this happy connection being broken by civil dissentions, and apprehending its future effects, if left any longer undisturbed, resolved to prevent her receiving such continual and formidable accessions of wealth and strength, by checking the growth of these settlements from which they were to be derived.

In the prosecution of this attempt events so unfavourable to the design took place, that every friend to the interests of Great Britain and these colonies entertained pleasing and reasonable expectations of seeing an additional force and extention immediately given to the operations of the union hitherto experienced, by an enlargement of the dominions of the Crown, and the removal of ancient and warlike enemies to a greater distance.

At the conclusion therefore of the late war, the most glorious and advantagious that ever had been carried on by British arms, your loyal colonists having contributed to its success, by such repeated and strenuous exertions, as frequently procured them the distinguished approbation of your Majesty, of the late king, and of Parliament, doubted not but that they should be permitted with the rest of the empire, to share in the blessings of peace and the emoluments of victory and conquest. While these recent and honorable acknowledgments of their merits remained on record in the journals and acts of the august legislature the Parliament, undefaced by the imputation or even the suspicion of any offence, they were alarmed by a new system of Statutes and regulations adopted for the administration of the colonies, that filled their minds with the most painful fears and jealousies; and to their inexpressible astonishment perceived the dangers of a foreign quarrel quickly succeeded by domestic dangers, in their judgment of a more dreadful kind.

Nor were their anxieties alleviated by any tendancy in this system to promote the welfare of the Mother Country. For ‘tho its effects were more immediately felt by them, yets its influence appeared to be injurious to the commerce and prosperity of Great Britain.

We shall decline the ungrateful task of describing the irksome variety of artifices practised by many of your Majestys ministers, the delusive pretences, fruitless terrors, and unavailing severities, that have from time to time been dealt out by them, in their attempts to execute this impolitic plan, or of traceing thro’ a series of years past the progress of the unhappy differences between Great Britain and these colonies which have flowed from this fatal source.

Your Majestys ministers persevering in their measures and proceeding to open hostilities for enforcing them, have compelled us to arm in our own defence, and have engaged us in a controversy so peculiarly abhorrent to the affection of your still faithful colonists, that when we consider whom we must oppose in this contest, and if it continues, what may be the consequences, our own particular misfortunes are accounted by us, only as parts of our distress.

Knowing, to what violent resentments and incurable animosities, civil discords are apt to exasperate and inflame the contending parties, we think ourselves required by indispensable obligations to Almighty God, to your Majesty, to our fellow subjects, and to ourselves, immediately to use all the means in our power not incompatible with our safety, for stopping the further effusion of blood, and for averting the impending calamities that threaten the British Empire.

Thus called upon to address your Majesty on affairs of such moment to America, and probably to all your dominions, we are earnestly desirous of performing this office with the utmost deference for your Majesty; and we therefore pray, that your royal magnanimity and benevolence may make the most favourable construction of our expressions on so uncommon an occasion. Could we represent in their full force the sentiments that agitate the minds of us your dutiful subjects, we are persuaded, your Majesty would ascribe any seeming deviation from reverence, and our language, and even in our conduct, not to any reprehensible intention but to the impossibility or reconciling the usual appearances of respect with a just attention to our own preservation against those artful and cruel enemies, who abuse your royal confidence and authority for the purpose of effecting our destruction.

Attached to your Majestys person, family and government with all the devotion that principle and affection can inspire, connected with Great Britain by the strongest ties that can unite societies, and deploring every event that tends in any degree to weaken them, we solemnly assure your Majesty, that we not only most ardently desire the former harmony between her and these colonies may be restored but that a concord may be established between them upon so firm a basis, as to perpetuate its blessings uninterrupted by any future dissentions to succeeding generations in both countries, and to transmit your Majestys name to posterity adorned with that signal and lasting glory that has attended the memory of those illustrious personages, whose virtues and abilities have extricated states from dangerous convulsions, and by securing happiness to others, have erected the most noble and durable monuments to their own fame.

We beg leave further to assure your Majesty that notwithstanding the sufferings of your loyal colonists during the course of the present controversy, our breasts retain too tender a regard for the kingdom from which we derive our origin to request such a reconciliation as might in any manner be inconsistent with her dignity or her welfare. These, related as we are to her, honor and duty, as well as inclination induce us to support and advance; and the apprehensions that now oppress our hearts with unspeakable grief, being once removed, your Majesty will find your faithful subjects on this continent ready and willing at all times, as they ever have been with their lives and fortunes to assert and maintain the rights and interests of your Majesty and of our Mother Country.

We therefore beseech your Majesty, that your royal authority and influence may be graciously interposed to procure us releif [sic] from our afflicting fears and jealousies occasioned by the system before mentioned, and to settle peace through every part of your dominions, with all humility submitting to your Majesty’s wise consideration, whether it may not be expedient for facilitating those important purposes, that your Majesty be pleased to direct some mode by which the united applications of your faithful colonists to the throne, in pursuance of their common councils, may be improved into a happy and permanent reconciliation; and that in the meantime measures be taken for preventing the further destruction of the lives of your Majesty’s subjects; and that such statutes as more immediately distress any of your Majestys colonies be repealed: For by such arrangements as your Majesty’s wisdom can form for collecting the united sense of your American people, we are convinced, your Majesty would receive such satisfactory proofs of the disposition of the colonists towards their sovereign and the parent state, that the wished for opportunity would soon be restored to them, of evincing the sincerity of their professions by every testimony of devotion becoming the most dutiful subjects and the most affectionate colonists.

That your Majesty may enjoy a long and prosperous reign, and that your descendants may govern your dominions with honor to themselves and happiness to their subjects is our sincere and fervent prayer.


141 posted on 01/05/2009 8:58:02 AM PST by Mouton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: doodad

Let ‘em do whatever they want. There are so many problems now and will continue to be (think Social Security and Medicare blowing up soon). Why do we want Conservative Republicans in charge so they can get the blame? Let all this play out with the Liberals in power.With Franken, the tainted Illinois appointment and probably Caroline in NY, what a joke the Senate is going to be. And to think 2 more (Delaware and Colorado) will have unelected senators.


142 posted on 01/05/2009 8:59:08 AM PST by bombthrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Isn’t this basically what Hitler did? Run everyone except the Nazi’s out of government?


143 posted on 01/05/2009 8:59:09 AM PST by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar

“In reaction, the House Republican leadership is sending a letter today to Pelosi to object to changes to House Rules this week that would bar Republicans from offering alternative bills, amendments to Democrat bills or even the guarantee of open debate accessible by motions to recommit for any piece of legislation during the entire 111th Congress. These procedural abuses, as outlined in the below letter obtained by HUMAN EVENTS, would also include the repeal of six-year limit for committee chairmen and other House Rules reform measures enacted in 1995 as part of the Contract with America.”

Democrats are out to destroy American freedom, one abuse at a time.


144 posted on 01/05/2009 9:00:26 AM PST by WOSG (Obama - a born in the USA socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar

I think this fable belongs on this thread:

The Scorpion and the Frog
One day, a scorpion looked around at the mountain where he lived and decided that he wanted a change. So he set out on a journey through the forests and hills. He climbed over rocks and under vines and kept going until he reached a river.
The river was wide and swift, and the scorpion stopped to reconsider the situation. He couldn’t see any way across. So he ran upriver and then checked downriver, all the while thinking that he might have to turn back.

Suddenly, he saw a frog sitting in the rushes by the bank of the stream on the other side of the river. He decided to ask the frog for help getting across the stream.

“Hellooo Mr. Frog!” called the scorpion across the water, “Would you be so kind as to give me a ride on your back across the river?”

“Well now, Mr. Scorpion! How do I know that if I try to help you, you wont try to kill me?” asked the frog hesitantly.

“Because,” the scorpion replied, “If I try to kill you, then I would die too, for you see I cannot swim!”

Now this seemed to make sense to the frog. But he asked. “What about when I get close to the bank? You could still try to kill me and get back to the shore!”

“This is true,” agreed the scorpion, “But then I wouldn’t be able to get to the other side of the river!”

“Alright then...how do I know you wont just wait till we get to the other side and THEN kill me?” said the frog.

“Ahh...,” crooned the scorpion, “Because you see, once you’ve taken me to the other side of this river, I will be so grateful for your help, that it would hardly be fair to reward you with death, now would it?!”

So the frog agreed to take the scorpion across the river. He swam over to the bank and settled himself near the mud to pick up his passenger. The scorpion crawled onto the frog’s back, his sharp claws prickling into the frog’s soft hide, and the frog slid into the river. The muddy water swirled around them, but the frog stayed near the surface so the scorpion would not drown. He kicked strongly through the first half of the stream, his flippers paddling wildly against the current.

Halfway across the river, the frog suddenly felt a sharp sting in his back and, out of the corner of his eye, saw the scorpion remove his stinger from the frog’s back. A deadening numbness began to creep into his limbs.

“You fool!” croaked the frog, “Now we shall both die! Why on earth did you do that?”

The scorpion shrugged, and did a little jig on the drownings frog’s back.

“I could not help myself. It is my nature.”

Then they both sank into the muddy waters of the swiftly flowing river.


145 posted on 01/05/2009 9:01:23 AM PST by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar

All republicans and most democrats who work on the Hill can’t stand this woman. Seriously, just ask them and they will tell you. It’s really bad.


146 posted on 01/05/2009 9:02:14 AM PST by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

That’s what I think is going to happen too. No GOP reps or Sens. should vote for any piece of legistation that is marginal or even only unpopular. That way, the fingers will only be pointing one way when the house of cards comes down.


147 posted on 01/05/2009 9:05:55 AM PST by Lou Budvis ("I did not have sex with that woman..." = "I did not have contact with the governor..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Right Cal Gal
I think America may just be catching on.....

We the people do have some power. McLame DID get over 50 million votes. We just need to organize. The RNC needs to learn how to mobilze and motivate via the internet.

148 posted on 01/05/2009 9:06:11 AM PST by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Tempest

And here all this time I thought we lived in a democracy that championed free speech, free exchange of ideas, freedom to protest, freedom to oppose. I guess my earlier opinion that the democrats are the true party of communists has just been proven.


149 posted on 01/05/2009 9:08:11 AM PST by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Tempest

And here all this time I thought we lived in a democracy that championed free speech, free exchange of ideas, freedom to protest, freedom to oppose. I guess my earlier opinion that the democrats are the true party of communists has just been proven.


150 posted on 01/05/2009 9:08:13 AM PST by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
The sad thing is, the American public has no clue this is happening. Even if they did, they would not understand what it means. To those who understand, they will not care.

Only a handful of patriots who object to this and who know what the outcome will be will take a stand. But it will not be made widely public as the MSM buries it or covers it up.

It will pass, along with all the other countless assaults on this country and it's liberty. And the countless RINOs in the Legislature will sit passively by and let it happen without even a whimper.

151 posted on 01/05/2009 9:08:45 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (WHAT? Where did my tag line go? (ACORN))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jennyjenny

Does she HAVE to be Speaker - is there some rule that requires them to re-elect her?


152 posted on 01/05/2009 9:08:45 AM PST by Right Cal Gal (Abraham Lincoln would have let Berkeley leave the Union without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

Nope. There will be no fighting for our lives. Most conservatives are content to let the liberals make a mess of things and think that America will somehow learn a lesson from it all and wake up. What those conservatives don’t or won’t realize is that the snowball rolling downhill will soon become an avalanche headed straight for them. In teaching America a lesson, they’re going to be “schooled” themselves.


153 posted on 01/05/2009 9:10:10 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP

P - lousy dirty politics ping


154 posted on 01/05/2009 9:10:33 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (The main stream media lied - America died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
Yes she can!
155 posted on 01/05/2009 9:11:56 AM PST by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine
"Didn’t you see that strongly worded letter to Madame Pelosi at the bottom of the link?"

Yep, saw that, and it made me want to puke. They're gutless wonders.

156 posted on 01/05/2009 9:15:22 AM PST by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar

Pelosi Peron chanells Hitler


157 posted on 01/05/2009 9:15:54 AM PST by spokeshave (0bambi wants to kill babies and raise taxes, Sarah wants to raise babies and kill taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
Good for her. Apparently She has more guts than the the entire RNC and all the Pubbie reps combined.

If the Pubbies had a spine, they would have done this while they were in charge. Then, if they kept to conservative principles instead of spending like drunken sailors, they would still be in control and the Dems would be weeping and gnashing their teeth.

Bet the MSM STILL finds a way to blame everything on the Pubbies, though.

158 posted on 01/05/2009 9:15:59 AM PST by Little Ray (Do we have a Plan B?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar

It doesn’t look like we’ll have time to stop this in the forward direction, but if someone could post a list of who votes for it, I’d like to be able to send an email in retrospect.


159 posted on 01/05/2009 9:18:35 AM PST by kc8ukw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

After the “olive branch letter” quoted above, it is time to ready the “when in the course of human events” letter.

The government now has gotten completely out of its channel. People against amnesty, politicians vote for it...people against bailouts...politicians vote for it...now we don’t even have a say if you are in the minority party. I bet that is how they felt in Germany when Hitler took over and outlawed all parties except the Nazi party. Time to wake up folks.

Above all, to those jokes from the GOP up in Congress, TAKE THE GLOVES OFF.


160 posted on 01/05/2009 9:19:10 AM PST by Mouton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 341 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson