Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN Places Sarah Palin With 2008's Criminals, Sex Addicts, and the Corrupt
Newsbusters ^ | January 4, 2009 | Warner Todd Huston

Posted on 01/04/2009 11:52:27 AM PST by SolidWood

Showing they have no sense of morality, no grasp of corruption and no understanding of what defines a criminal, CNN gives us another one of those ubiquitous year in review stories, this one titled "Politicians who fell from grace in 2008." In this one, CNN has decided to reveal for us their top eight politicians that found 2008 to be a "career-buster" because of their "crimes and misdemeanors" or their outrageous controversies.

CNN features corruption mired Rod Blagojevich, the sex crazed Elliot Spitzer and John Edwards, and the criminal bribe taker Ted Stevens among four others. Each of these men in the CNN list have either been convicted of criminal actions, are indicted for corruption, lost their positions, been drummed out of their party, or are soon to face jail time. Among these eight criminals, however, is a name that doesn't belong among this class of serial abuser of the public trust. It won't be shocking to note that among the worst sex criminals, bribe takers, liars and thieves in politics for 2008, CNN ridiculously included the name of Governor Sarah Palin.

Palin, however, has done nothing remotely like what these other political ner-do-wells have done. She did not take bribes, she did not indulge in sexual dalliances with co-workers or call girls, she did not get booted from her party or lose her job as Governor. She is not under indictment nor does she face jail time, yet CNN includes her in a list with Rob Blagojevich, John Edwards, Kwame Kilpatrick, Larry Langford, Tim Maloney, Elliot Spitzer and Ted Stevens.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: 2008review; bias; boycottcnn; cnn; liberalmedia; lies; media; mediaterror; palin; pds; sarahpalin; smears
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-154 next last
To: Big_Monkey

I personally think it is a little more difficult to beat Katie Couric or any interviewer for that matter when they edit their interviews before airing them and also meet w/ the other candidates foreign advisors etc. to sabotage the interview. Oratory and communication skills are easily obtained with practice if she decides to run for national office again - what’s harder to establish is character, charisma and conservative values. I like to give people the benefit of doubt before casting stones and assuming they are not capable. It’s times like those (for me personally) when I actually come out stronger and tougher to prove people wrong - she strikes me as the same type of person (but again that’s years away so we will see).


81 posted on 01/04/2009 1:00:40 PM PST by Lilpug15 (I'm Moving to Alaska...You can Keep THE CHANGE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Mr_Moonlight

Thank you! I knew I misspelled something.


82 posted on 01/04/2009 1:01:25 PM PST by Lazamataz (Illegal Zombies: Just Eating the Brains that Ordinary Americans Won't Eat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood; redhead; hosepipe
Hey CNN, Like you boys to know that being from Alaska, got a little inside for you...What? CNN has someone from Alaska to verify your story? Guess I know which village he is from...Lower end of the slime, that village would be "Likmynutsak".


Hope your correspondent rots in hel!
83 posted on 01/04/2009 1:01:30 PM PST by Issaquahking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

Shameless, tasteless, classless fools.


84 posted on 01/04/2009 1:02:54 PM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

CNN.....is a family of creeps.


85 posted on 01/04/2009 1:03:55 PM PST by cookcounty ("A ship in harbor is safe, but that's not why the ship is built." ---Governor Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BrokenSmile

You should know since you are a lib right? Saw your posts - have fun trolling around!


86 posted on 01/04/2009 1:06:23 PM PST by Lilpug15 (I'm Moving to Alaska...You can Keep THE CHANGE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Lilpug15
"I personally think it is a little more difficult to beat Katie Couric or any interviewer for that matter when they edit their interviews before airing them.."

In the business, it's called "live to tape". Why the McCain camp didn't insist on this as a precondition for all of her interviews is completely lost on me.

As for your learning curve point, I think it's valid. Perhaps Palin has taken valuable lessons from this campaign which she can apply to her next.

But, I think the larger point I was trying to make in my earlier posts is still correct. Palin's inability to deal with tough, uncomfortable questions was her downfall - everything else could have been managed. She gave the club to the Media and they beat her over the head with it.

87 posted on 01/04/2009 1:06:50 PM PST by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

Well said!


88 posted on 01/04/2009 1:08:17 PM PST by Rockiette (Democrats are not intelligent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
To a point, yes.

But the reverse is deadly true. Even if you were “born beautiful” but acquire a foul, ill-tempered, damn the world attitude (dare I say liberal) will sour the most beautiful of women.

Look at Gloria Steinem(feminism) Pamela Anderson (Peta) and Brigitte Bardot (animal rights, liberal). There are many more examples...

All were very good looking but their fanaticism destroyed their looks. Or rather, the discontent, frustration and hostility (ugliness) on the inside affected the appearance on the outside.

And Governor Palin is a good example of a woman whose at peace with the world and her life and whose values are complimentary of her beauty on the outside.

89 posted on 01/04/2009 1:12:33 PM PST by RedMonqey (Embracing my "Inner Redneck")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine
Shameless, tasteless, classless fools.

Deceiving, disgusting, self promoting fools.

Just my take on it my FRiend. ; )

90 posted on 01/04/2009 1:12:53 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, Question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

CNN = Communist News Network


91 posted on 01/04/2009 1:15:32 PM PST by jarofants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedMonqey; All

Reference post #69.


92 posted on 01/04/2009 1:16:02 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, Question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

Disgusting. A new low for CNN on a long list of lows.


93 posted on 01/04/2009 1:23:55 PM PST by citizen (Fascism: All persons, capital & activities exist to support the will & best interests of the State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Issaquahking
You may have responded to the wrong moron..
Your comment seems to be nonsense..
94 posted on 01/04/2009 1:24:50 PM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
You forgot congressman William Jefferson of Louisiana... ; )
The list was CNN's, not mine. I guess they forgot William Jefferson, Democrat from Louisiana.

And the fact that he had a (D) after his name had nothing to do with that. Nothing at all . . .


95 posted on 01/04/2009 1:24:59 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (We already HAVE a fairness doctrine. It's called, "the Constitution." Accept no substitute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

This is really outrageous and unfair. CNN should be called on the carpet for this dishonest hit piece.


96 posted on 01/04/2009 1:25:10 PM PST by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood; All
That's ok, just yesterday I placed her on my wall.

Yep, I got the 2009 Sarah Palin calendar!

97 posted on 01/04/2009 1:26:48 PM PST by houeto (Material abundance without character is the path to destruction. - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

chill.....


98 posted on 01/04/2009 1:27:14 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, Question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Big_Monkey
[Palin] also appears to be a successful state CEO and I'm glad she's a conservative but she just doesn't have the intellectual horsepower to compete on the national stage. If you can't beat Katie freakin Couric in the interview game, you just don't have what it takes.

I believe you're selling Palin short.

"Intellectual horsepower" isn't what you're looking for. You're looking for somebody who is a natural-born presenter, knows their subject and is passionate about it. To excel at this skill requires -- not IQ -- but practice.

I speak from experience -- in the conference room and in the media.

As a matter of fact, GWB probably has all the "intellectual horsepower" you could want. He's a graduate of Yale, has an MBA from Harvard (when it meant something) and was a supersonic fighter pilot (there are no stupid people flying supersonic jets). Inarticulate, yes. Unskilled at presenting, yes. But all the "intellectual horsepower" you could hope for. And, unfortunately, no amount of practice made him better at this arcane game.

In that sense, I believe that Palin has everything it takes to be an amazing presenter -- a deep knowledge of state affairs, a remarkable passion and a quick mind. In addition, she's quite engaging in a media, mass or personal environment. She needs only to gain more exposure to (and knowledge of) national affairs...plus practice.

Oh, and being dependent upon McCain's team for background and briefing -- and required to defend McCain's policies -- well, that didn't help, either.

I agree that Giuliani and Romney could both carry off an anti-MSM positioning. But Giuliani and the base are far apart on many issues. Romney is closer to conservatism, perhaps, but deeply distrusted by many people in the base (rightly or wrongly).

Besides which, neither was strong enough to defeat John McCain -- a palpably weak candidate.

In my opinion, conservatism would be best served by a new generation of leaders. And Palin would certainly be one of the people on my list (though not the only one).

99 posted on 01/04/2009 1:29:23 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood
“She did not take bribes, she did not indulge in sexual dalliances with co-workers or call girls, she did not get booted from her party or lose her job as Governor. She is not under indictment nor does she face jail time...”

You overlook the fact that she didn't abort all of her pregnancies and she goes to church every Sunday. In the view of democrats these are some of the worst crimes one can commit.

100 posted on 01/04/2009 1:33:44 PM PST by saneright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson