Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FR Negative Comments Thread: do Nothing about Certifigate/Obama-Biden Corruption; Bash Vanities Here
January 03, 2009 | Golden Gate

Posted on 01/03/2009 9:00:24 PM PST by Golden Gate

FR and others need to have a working group for Jan 8 when Congress meets in a Joint Session to count the votes from the Electoral College.

Many conservatives are NOT interested. So THIS is the Thread for all the negative and silly comments. If I have time to post other threads, there is work to be done.

For those who are interested in a FR Working Group for the Congress to "Say NO to Barack & Joe" on Jan. 8th, don't post here. If I don't get the threads posted tonight, start one yourself.

I can imagine some of the obvious objections:

It's too late... = Since many people have a short attention span for politics, this may be perfect. Just about 5 days for a nationwide campaign.

It'll cause rioting in the streets... - Many of those who voted Dem in Nov. didn't really know who or what they were voting for. Time for many of them to change their mind.

The first official debate thread that needs to be posted is: FR: Are we going to Stand as Patriots, or lay down as losers? Say NO to Obama/Biden Jan 8

Other threads needed:

FR: Are Obama & Biden among the 'Kings of Corruption'? Suitable for President/VP? List/Document Here

FR: Barack Obama has "color of skin". But Obama/Biden FAIL at "the content of their character". Need Alternatives

FR Working Group: Jan 8th US Congress needs 51 Sen + 218 Reps to Say NO! to Obama/Biden



(( in a hurry & out of time )) In general, with the 2008 election process about complete, I'm tired of people who "wanted" to be President / VP. Starting now, let's find people who "DESERVE" to President / VP. See my page for my suggestions.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; donquixote; obama; obamagate; obamatruthfile
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
On the working group threads, we need the best accurate info of the process / options of finding alternatives to Obama / Biden...

Initial info we have now - can it be confirmed, & need more details on the Working Group Threads:

On Nov 4th, 2008, almost 69 1/2 Million Americans voted for the Democratic Ticket for President and VP. (per the TheGreenPapers.com)

On Thursday, January 8, 2009, 51 US Senators and 218 Representatives could give the United States a second chance to find alternatives to Obama and Biden. Our Nation needs to find a President and VP with the integrity that we need in our leaders. (numbers per FR - Jim Noble)

Who is interested in starting a Nationwide Campaign...?

Note: (Recommend you change the Jan 6 date in your About page to Jan 8. Public Law 110-430 changed the date of the electoral vote in Congress in 2009 from January 6 to January 8. This date change is effective only for the 2008 presidential election.
http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/officials.html ) ((per frog in a pot)) Thanks for that info!


-----------------------


Is there any significance to the Zogby Poll that indicated ...? / how the news media affected the Democratic voters / ... that the Dem voters don't really know that much about Barrack Obama. Those voters, and our whole country needs a Second Chance to find the leaders we need, that have the integrity, and will choose the best policies for the USA.


-----------------------

[FR - Kevmo] ~ ~ ...As far as the 365 Electoral Votes, that doesn’t count towards qualification because the language in the 20th Amendment Sct3 says: “if the President elect shall have failed to qualify”. So that means that it’s the president elect who can fail to qualify. That’s AFTER the popular vote, and even AFTER the electoral college. The qualification process starts today, now that he is the president elect. (Mon, Dec 15th PM) If there were no evidence against his eligibility, there wouldn’t be all this noise in the first place and you know it.

20th Amendment Sct3 (FR Thread): http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2145602/posts

***I am among them. I know that he won the election. The constitution says clearly that a person can win the election, be president elect, and yet STILL fail to qualify. So we’re digging into the process of determining qualification of a president elect, especially in light of the fact that there are over a dozen lawsuits filed saying that he isn’t qualified. Two of those have gotten considered & dismissed by the Supreme Court, the two that were independent of the forged CoLB evidence. So the only path remaining is the consideration of forgery and obfuscation on the path to zer0bama qualifying. This is a constitutional issue (crisis, really), this is a constitutional website, and you are deriding us? Who do you think you are?
8 years of lefty nutcases declaring that W was illegitimate have done serious harm to the republic. ***I haven’t detected any harm, certainly not serious harm to our republic. Outline your case for such harm. ...#103
(** 3 Posts - edited / golden summary)

103, 9, 69 posted on Monday, December 15, 2008 5:26:45 PM by Kevmo
( It’s all over for this Country as a Constitutional Republic. ~Leo Donofrio, 12/14/08)

These are my thoughts. Other threads will probably not be posted by me tonight.

Anyway, this is a negative comment thread...

1 posted on 01/03/2009 9:00:25 PM PST by Golden Gate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Golden Gate

You N()()bs and your vanities... ;-)


2 posted on 01/03/2009 9:09:15 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (Barack Obama: In Error and arrogant -- he's errogant!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Golden Gate
You left out the golden ring Louis Farrakhan math!!!
3 posted on 01/03/2009 9:09:57 PM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Golden Gate

And with this post I remove ‘Free Republic’ from my bookmarks. I assume I’ll still lurk here, but who knows? Whether you like to admit it or not, he lost. Do I hate it? Yes, of course, but he won. When Bush first won people were complaining that he stole the election, to this day there are still idiots arguing that he stole the election - you are no better than those idiots. Lose with dignity, lose gracefully, don’t bring conservatism down with you.


4 posted on 01/03/2009 9:14:00 PM PST by Vaak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaak

settle down youg man.


5 posted on 01/03/2009 9:22:15 PM PST by bobby.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
You N()()bs and your vanities... ;-)

Membership of 10 years is considered a "Noob"??

6 posted on 01/03/2009 9:22:25 PM PST by submarinerswife ("If I win I can't 't be stopped! If I lose I shall be dead." - George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vaak

You assume it’s all about winning or losing. But, for some, it’s about upholding the Constitution. It’s highly unlikely that disqualifying Obama would result in anything other than a Democrat replacement. And yet, the issue continues to be pressed. This seems to have confused you.

If you’re so controlling as to want to dictate the subject matter that is acceptable, maybe you can start your own political blog. Many have. Good luck with that.


7 posted on 01/03/2009 9:23:24 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: submarinerswife

Look up “sarcasm” in a dictionary.


8 posted on 01/03/2009 9:25:59 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (Barack Obama: In Error and arrogant -- he's errogant!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Vaak

Disagree like an adult. Threatening to leave based upon your misunderstanding of the OP is childish.


9 posted on 01/03/2009 9:28:50 PM PST by submarinerswife ("If I win I can't 't be stopped! If I lose I shall be dead." - George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Thanking a vet.Got it.


10 posted on 01/03/2009 9:30:16 PM PST by submarinerswife ("If I win I can't 't be stopped! If I lose I shall be dead." - George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Vaak

Do you believe former Senator Obama is legally qualified according to our Constitution to hold the office of President of the United States?


11 posted on 01/03/2009 9:30:26 PM PST by John W (Voters were more afraid of losing their money than losing their souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Golden Gate

I only have one negative comment.... WHY do we need this thread, again?


12 posted on 01/03/2009 9:31:03 PM PST by Mobile Vulgus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

I was never aware that upholding the Constitution involved conspiracy theories. Sorry, but I don’t fit in there. There’s not enough there to grab onto a belief that he’s going in without meeting the Constitutional qualifications to become President.
Ahh well, at least there are some famous people on your side like Alan Keyes, Alex Jones, Jeff Rense amongst other people, no, those people don’t make your side crazy at all.


13 posted on 01/03/2009 9:35:30 PM PST by Vaak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: Vaak

Are you talking about Obama conspiring to conceal virtually every record of his life? Let’s keep it straight here, if you’re going to go all tinfoil on us.

Break it down, Vaak. Who’s conspiring, and who’s theorizing?


15 posted on 01/03/2009 9:40:21 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Brutus509
Not sure what working groups are, but the goals outlined by the poster will can surely be accomplished—in OZ.

Your lack of support doesn't change anything, Brutus509, so you might as well give up.

16 posted on 01/03/2009 9:42:50 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Look up “sarcasm” in a dictionary.

Some things are just too obvious. :-)

18 posted on 01/03/2009 9:44:31 PM PST by South40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: Brutus509

huhn??

munchkin land.. been taking some of Ayers lsd?


20 posted on 01/03/2009 9:50:34 PM PST by outlawjake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson