You did not read my thread.
Why not just reference several books to be read. I scanned your link, but summarize whatever interpretation you have.
But nothing you post will change the fact that as these situations come up, if they do, they courts will settle the questions, as they do on most everything. Not saying that's how it should be, but that is the way it is.
Isn’t the Pidgeon case (Broe v Reed) being heard today en banc at the WASC?
Does anyone know what time it is being heard?