Sounds like another something for nothing scheme.
If it works, one wonders why the existing injection system wasn't better optimized for droplet size? So it probably doesn't.
I don’t think so, this time. It seems to make sense...........
well, the guy’s a professor and I assume the article was in a peer-reviewed journal. So while that’s not an iron clad guarantee, it does give it a little more credibility than if it was some garage tinkerer making the claim.
Not really. I’ve heard, in the past, that heating fuel prior to it entering the system will increas effeciency also. Actually, it’s a fairly simple and inexpensive system to play with.
The method does not change the temperature of the crude oil; instead, it temporary aggregates paraffin particles or asphaltene particles inside the crude oil into large ones. This particle aggregation changes the rheological property of the crude oil and leads to the viscosity reduction. While this viscosity reduction is not permanent, it is suitable for many important applications, such as oil transport via deepwater pipelines, since it lasts for several hours and is repeatable.
Herm, I’ve seen these before. Might as well be selling or researching “snake oil.”
When I was a small child I lost a tooth and put it under my pillow for the Tooth Fairy. I did not tell my mom, and the she was wakened the next morning by my screams of.” that Damn Tooth Fairy forgot me.”
There “aint no tooth fairy” nor is there a bolt on electronmagnetic device that will make the fuel less viscous that does not envolve heat or cracking of molecular bonds.