Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sport; BonRad; LucyT; rodguy911; STARWISE

“sport” said — “Won’t matter. The fix is in and has been in for a long time.”

From the looks of it, it seems that is clear. I’ve been saying that state laws need to be passed to prevent this from happening again (re: vetting the candidate, precisely and according to statute). But, there are people here (some) who want to invent such crazy ideas of how they are going to get Obama out of office. They just don’t make any sense.

The only thing that does make sense is their *desire* to get him out of office, but they’ve lost all connection to *reality* and invent such crazy ideas that they think are going to work that have no basis in reality. It’s quite amazing to see such a “melt-down” of common sense...


183 posted on 01/01/2009 8:25:30 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]


To: Star Traveler
I know there is some “way out” stuff going on about the BC. Part of it is that we have been ignored by such an obvious violation of the Constitution and Federal law!
The other part is talk radio refusing to come aboard,pisses a lot of us off.
184 posted on 01/01/2009 8:30:01 AM PST by rodguy911 (HOME OF THE FREE BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE--GO SARAHCUDA !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

To: Star Traveler; sport; BonRad; rodguy911; Kevmo; null and void; Iowan; autumnraine; seekthetruth; ...

From an eMail; might be of interest:

“If the House certifies the electoral votes on Jan 8, then every single US Citizen will have standing to challenge the legitimacy of Obama’s presidency.

“The Supreme Court scheduled two conferences: one, on Jan 9 (a day after the House meets to certify the Electoral College votes), is to hear Phil Berg’s writ of certiori which will be approved as a mere formality if the House certifies the Electoral vote count thus paving the way to hear the main event: Berg’s injunction to stay the results until Obama proves his eligibility.

“If Obama fails to provide his credentials before taking the Oath of Office, Supreme Court (SCOTUS) will then overturn the election results.

“SCOTUS deliberately chose the day after the House meets on the oft-chance that the House will do the right thing and stay the certification pending Obama’s proof of eligibility. If he fails to do so, then they can invalidate the results.

“If they certify the vote, then SCOTUS is also prepared, as they have scheduled the conference on the injunction on Jan 16 — four days before the swearing in of the President — to trap Obama, who will have no choice but to present his credentials.

“If he fails to prove his qualifications, then SCOTUS can invalidate the election.

“If that does not happen; meaning, if Obama is allowed to walk free from this, then from the moment he recites the “pledge to uphold the constitution,” he becomes guilty of perjury and has no validity, whatsoever, to serve as President.

“Our armed forces are already pledged to uphold and defend the Constitution, meaning they should, and will, refuse to follow any orders he might give as a bogus Commander-in-Chief.

“The floodgates on personal lawsuits against the President will have been opened, and anyone suffering any kind of damages, be they financial, physical, psychological, educational, medical, and all sorts of civil rights violations, will have been opened, and effectively handcuffing the President from acting as President.”


195 posted on 01/01/2009 9:09:08 AM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson