Posted on 12/30/2008 6:33:51 PM PST by BGHater
Despite keeping Defense Secretary Robert Gates in the Pentagon, President-elect Obama’s transition team informed 90 Bush appointees their services will not be needed after Inauguration Day.
Scott Gration, a senior official on Obama’s transition team, called and emailed several of President Bush’s Pentagon appointees about 10 days ago to inform them they were being dismissed.
Those calls and emails were followed up by an email from Jim O'Beirne, the special assistant to the secretary of defense for White House liaisons, who expressed exasperation that Gration informed the employees directly instead of letting O'Beirne's office know first.
"With regard to the process, I am unable to provide an explanation," O'Beirne wrote on Tuesday in the email, which was obtained by The Hill. "I played no part in it, and I will not speculate why matters were handled as they were."
A spokesman for the Pentagon said Gates was "absolutely satisfied" with the way the transition was handled.
Gates "is sensitive to the fact that a number of appointees will not be able to stay on after [Jan.] 20th," Defense Department spokesman Geoff Morrell said. He noted Gates did request many appointees stay on and the "Obama team was able to cooperate."
But O'Beirne made it clear in the email that in some cases of dismissal, he thinks the employee's politics played a role in their being let go.
O'Beirne said that Gates had "sought to keep virtually his entire team in place pending the availability of Obama replacements."
Out of roughly 250 political appointees, 90 were dismissed.
"Whatever negotiations occurred in pursuit of that goal, the Gration notifications evidently reflected the results of those efforts," O'Beirne wrote.
Traditionally political appointees resign at the end of a president’s term, leaving the new commander in chief to put his own team in place but with Gates staying in the top Pentagon job there was reason to believe many of his staff would also stay.
The Obama team noted that a majority of the political appointees will remain in place.
"Given that our nation is at war, we have asked several political appointees at the Department of Defense to stay in their jobs past January 20th to help ensure a smooth transition. We are grateful for the cooperation and professionalism of the men and women at the Department of Defense in support of our men and women in uniform," an Obama transition official said.
Bush has repeatedly stated that he wanted to see an orderly transition to ensure that the next president would hit the ground running at a time when the country is fighting two wars and weathering one of the most significant economic crises in modern times.
Until now, that process seemed to be going smoothly as a number of departments have reported efficient and even cordial working relationships between Bush appointees and transition officials. The holiday Pentagon dismissals appear to be the first breakdown.
In the email, O'Beirne tried to assure the soon-to-be displaced employees that the decisions were based on "policy change in the Obama administration" and not based on performance.
However, he said, if employees "harbor residual doubts" then they can "content yourself with the likelihood that it was your outstanding performance as a Bush appointee that drew the opposition's attention to you."
"In that regard, you may take justifiable satisfaction that you were among the first to be chosen," O'Beirne wrote.
Other reasons O'Beirne cited for employees' dismissal were "politics, matter of policy and availability of qualified replacements and the strength of the permanent career and uniformed staffs."
Morrell, a political appointee who is staying at the Pentagon, noted that while O'Beirne is usually the liaison for political appointees Gates chief of staff Robert Rangel has taken over that role. Rangel is also staying on.
"Jim has had to defer many of the things he could normally respond to," Morrell said as a possible explanation for the email.
Nothing surprises me about B[end] 0[ver] any more. Being let go via email has always been a no-no for military personnel.
I think they'll give him the year but he won't make it to 18 months.
This isn't something new. Reagan replaced all the Carter appointees (Thank God!), Clinton replaced all the Bush appointees, and Bush replaced all the Clinton ones. It's not going to change now.
You are very perceptive. Even retired LCDRs do not want to hear the word no!
So what? Biden becomes POTUS and stays the same hard-left course.
True, but the Constitution will be observed. That's important to some, myself included.
Besides, Biden is a hack, and without the discipline of the Chicago "school", he'll get a lot less of the agenda actually implemented.
You weren't following along. Of course it's nothing new. But once upon a time, it didn't just go to the highest management/leadership levels, it went all the way down to the lowest clerk, postmaster, and the guy who mucked out the White House Stables. It no longer goes down anywhere near that far.
But Bush did not replace all the Clinton appointees, although he should have.
The purge begins. Obama will play by the communist rulebook and purge “unreliable” officers from the military, beginning at the highest levels and working down. It worked for Hugo Chavez, and it will work here.
Not in Business either. Doing it can end up on the I Hate My Ex-Boss webb site.
Gates is only a interim SecDef. Westley Clark is slated to get the position in May of 2010
... nice work connecting the dots, kristinn. Sets the stage for what we can expect to see at DOD. Great way to start off ..../s
Absolutely, this will be a rat show all the way and incrementalism is still the name of the game. They won't get rid of everyone all at once but you can be sure the new/rat list is already completed and every vote they could buy with the promise of a new job has been bought.
Aside from being nonsensical, what exactly does that comment have to do with the Pentagon dismissals, which is, after all, the topic of the thead.
It's not the dismissal of these people -- I'm sure none of them were surprised -- it's the classless way it was done.
It doesn't bode well for the future.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.