This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 12/24/2008 2:47:48 AM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:
Locked - civility suffering here. Personal attacks, calling people names, insulting them just isn’t nice - and it can easily result in being banned - just a word to the wise. |
Posted on 12/23/2008 12:42:44 PM PST by BP2
No. 08-570 | ||||
Title: |
|
|||
Docketed: | October 31, 2008 | |||
Lower Ct: | United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit |
Case Nos.: | (08-4340) |
Rule 11 |
~~~Date~~~ | ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Oct 30 2008 | Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 1, 2008) | |
Oct 31 2008 | Application (08A391) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter. | |
Nov 3 2008 | Supplemental brief of applicant Philip J. Berg filed. | |
Nov 3 2008 | Application (08A391) denied by Justice Souter. | |
Nov 18 2008 | Waiver of right of respondents Federal Election Commission, et al. to respond filed. | |
Dec 1 2008 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Bill Anderson. | |
Dec 8 2008 | Application (08A505) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter. | |
Dec 9 2008 | Application (08A505) denied by Justice Souter. | |
Dec 15 2008 | Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Kennedy. | |
Dec 17 2008 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 9, 2009. | |
Dec 17 2008 | Application (08A505) denied by Justice Kennedy. | |
Dec 18 2008 | Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia. | |
Dec 23 2008 | Application (08A505) referred to the Court. | |
Dec 23 2008 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 16, 2009. |
---------------
|
No. 08A505 | ||||
Title: |
|
|||
Docketed: | ||||
Lower Ct: | United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit |
Case Nos.: | (08-4340) |
~~~Date~~~ | ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Dec 8 2008 | Application (08A505) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter. | |
Dec 9 2008 | Application (08A505) denied by Justice Souter. | |
Dec 15 2008 | Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Kennedy. | |
Dec 17 2008 | Application (08A505) denied by Justice Kennedy. |
|
Dec 18 2008 | Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia. | |
Dec 23 2008 | Application (08A505) referred to the Court. | |
Dec 23 2008 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 16, 2009. |
|
“From the evidence presented, it would appear that BHO was born in Hawaii and that would without question make him a natural born citizen.”
What evidence are you referring to and who “presented” it to you?
“I’ll just go on maintaining that the Constitution is perfectly clear on this matter”
And what pray tell is the clear meaning of the constitution on this matter?
“Any talented con man who arguably was born in one of the four states where birth certificates are private by statute must be allowed the presumption of being a natural born citizen”?
Did I get it right? Or do you have some other “clear meaning” to propose?
The Supreme Court of course does not always get the last word. In December 1856 Chief Justice Taney wrote for a 7-2 majority:
“They had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations; and so far inferior, that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit.”
It turned out that that wasn’t exactly crystal clear, was it?
There is no clear agreement who is a natural born citizen under Article 2, or who is to enforce the provision. It does seem crystal clear that Barry Obama is hiding something of a serious nature. Just because someone says “it’s crystal clear” that will not make this grave constitutional crisis go away.
They hang on like ticks on a hound, don't they?
And I have no forgiveness or trust of 0bama who has proven himself - even if he turns out to somehow be a natural born citizen - anything other than a lying, marxist, (former) crack head, narcissistic, racist, radical Muslim terrorist sympathizing, huge gov’t spending, criminal dirty politics practicing, homosexual agenda friendly, baby killing thug whose associates are to a man (and woman) similar slime, and has hidden practically all records about his entire life.
“From the evidence presented, it would appear that BHO was born in Hawaii and that would without question make him a natural born citizen.”
Could you please detail what that evidence is.
It seems as though more than a couple of these people themselves have dual or even triple citizenship, or were born in foreign countries, or have children or relatives who were so born. And the idea that none of them might be eligible to president if 0bama isn’t, upsets them.
Becoming president is not a right, for one thing.
That is, if what they are saying about their own citizenship, birth, relatives’ births, etc is true. On the internet, one never knows.
All all can find is that subpoenas were requested in the petion to the court. The service date for the Hawaii Department of Health Statistics, was to have been yesterday. I think if that had been served, it would have shown up in my search.
Does not say anything about Natural Born Citizenship. It talks about Citizens and Nationals "at birth", but not natural born citizens or natural born citizenship.
The intent and writing of the Constitution IS crystal clear, I capitalized the differences in the requirements. If a simple requirement of ordinary citizenship was the POTUS requirement, they would have said CITIZEN consistently. Instead they said:
Article. I.
No Person shall be a REPRESENTATIVE who shall not have attained to the Age of TWENTY FIVE YEARS, and been SEVEN YEARS a CITIZEN of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.
No Person shall be a SENATOR who shall not have attained to the Age of THIRTY YEARS, and been NINE YEARS a CITIZEN of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen.
NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of PRESIDENT; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of THIRTY FIVE YEARS, and been FOURTEEN Years a Resident within the United States.
So here we have it:
US Representative: Age 25, 7 yrs. resident & citizen
US Senator.......: Age 30, 9 yrs. resident & citizen
US PRESIDENT.....: Age 35, 14yrs. resident & NATURAL BORN
Obama has always known that he dooes not meet the requirement of Natural Born. It explains why he attempted to insert verbage into Senate Resolution 511 and the Passport breeches (thrice) by those advisors related to his campaign.
Sorry, I will never be bedfellows with a person who wants to charge our president with murder.
Wrong. That is exactly how cases get to be heard by the SCOTUS.
It helps me a hell of a lot more than it helps you. In addition, reason is on my side.
You can have 100 birth certificates but you won't be a natural-born citizen.
So, what is this? If I try to explain how this works to someone else, it's condescending? What's condescending is insisting against all reason and precedent that everyone who disagrees with you is wrong without providing a single shred of explanation or justification - like you have.
Okay, so if he was born in Hawaii, he would be a natural born citizen?
Perhaps I missed it, but what you linked said nothing about natural born citizen.
For most people, the issue of “natural born” is completely irrelevant.
The only job or position I know of where this is a requirement is that of the President of the United States. It is unique in this respect.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.