I noticed that many of the negative comments at Kristof’s website were posted by Liberals who did not seem to read all of the op-ed.
If they had read all of Kristof’s column they would have known that many of the “facts” in their counter-arguments were already disproved by Brooks.
Brooks did a wonderful job of anticipating what the deniers would say.
I noticed the same. It was as if they read the first 3 paragraphs, but not the rest of the article.
There *were* quite a few comments, though. I rather liked being able to engage the liberals on their own turf, but I wish the format allowed for more discussion.