So, if we plat too many trees we'll all freeze to death?...................
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: Red Badger
I hate to say it, but the global warming "scientists" have so ruined the credibility of all science that I'm starting to discount all of them...
Kind of what happened with the press when they went from believable to "obvious one-sided" shills...
52 posted on
12/19/2008 7:39:22 AM PST by
GOPJ
(Gun Control-:- like trying to control stray dogs by neutering veterinarians.- G. Jonas)
To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; BenLurkin; ...
54 posted on
12/21/2008 12:03:48 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile finally updated Saturday, December 6, 2008 !!!)
To: StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; 31R1O; ...
55 posted on
12/21/2008 12:04:28 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile finally updated Saturday, December 6, 2008 !!!)
To: Red Badger
For so many years the “Hockey Stick” model of global temperature ignored the Little Ice Age. Now we can blame the cooling we previously ignored on mankind as well.
To: Red Badger
Didn’t some scientist pretty much prove, the “little ice age” in question was a direct result of a massive supervolcanic eruption of Krakatoa in Indonesia, which wiped out agriculture around the planet?...
Or was that another little ice age?
Is this winter a little ice age?...
62 posted on
12/21/2008 9:54:18 PM PST by
Cringing Negativism Network
("Free Trade" = Fire Americans. Buy another company then fire more Americans.)
To: Red Badger
reforestation of agricultural lands-abandoned as the population collapsed-pulled so much carbon out of the atmosphere that it helped trigger a period of global cooling, at its most intense from approximately 1500 to 1750, known as the Little Ice Age. I get the feeling that the researchers started out with a conclusion already in mind, and looked for research to support it. Which is the worst kind of scientific research.
Was that much land under cultivation in the Americas? Nearly all Indian tribes were hunter-gatherers and had no cultivated land at all.
67 posted on
12/21/2008 11:40:22 PM PST by
denydenydeny
("Banish Merry Christmas. Get ready for Mad Max.."-Daniel Henninger)
To: Red Badger
I hope the “Warmers” have a contingency plan to put carbon BACK into the atmosphere should we begin to rapidly cool.
Right now, they’re playing with disaster.
68 posted on
12/22/2008 4:50:23 AM PST by
wolfcreek
(I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
To: Red Badger
69 posted on
12/22/2008 4:53:44 AM PST by
wolfcreek
(I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
To: Red Badger
I didn't know that this planet was so densely populated 250 - 500 years ago. As far as burning off land for farming, just how many acres could a farmer successfully handle way back then? I don't buy any of this crap!
Deforrestation was naturally occuring due to forest fires caused by lightning strikes. But in order to keep the grant money coming in, ya gotta find a way to blame it on man..........Because without a man made problem, you can't finance a man made solution.......
74 posted on
12/22/2008 5:35:45 AM PST by
Hot Tabasco
(Santa has three words for Barbara Walters: "Hoe Hoe Hoe")
To: Red Badger
Wow. Just when I think these people can't say anything stupider than they already have . . . .
78 posted on
12/23/2008 9:59:50 AM PST by
colorado tanker
("I just LOVE clinging to my guns and my religion!!!!" - Sarah Palin)
To: Red Badger
A graph is needed here. It looks like the Professor is attributing the precipitoius drop around 1550 to The Pandemic.
79 posted on
12/23/2008 10:07:32 AM PST by
Plutarch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson