Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SkyDancer

You asked — “What will happen later when we find out it’s true, the Obamination was ineligible to serve ... what are these judges going to say then ?”

Well, probably something like, you should have had a law that specified the “vetting process” and required a candidate to verify his qualification under the Constitution before putting him on the ballot and before he won the election...

And so..., that brings up what people should do, who are concerned about this kind of issue. Put state laws on the books that vet candidate or else they cannot be legally placed on the ballot.

That’s the solution to the problem.


26 posted on 12/17/2008 9:48:05 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Star Traveler

The problem is - it won’t do any good now ... maybe the next presidential election it will ....


36 posted on 12/17/2008 9:52:02 AM PST by SkyDancer ("Talent Without Ambition Is Sad, Ambition Without Talent Is Worse")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Star Traveler
Put state laws on the books that vet candidate or else they cannot be legally placed on the ballot.

The vetting argument is irrelevant and you can argue it all day long.

It does not change the fact he is probably ineligible to hold office.

84 posted on 12/17/2008 10:17:42 AM PST by Las Vegas Ron (The tree of liberty is getting mighty dry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson