Posted on 12/17/2008 9:33:30 AM PST by SmithL
if only the justices would read freerepublic, then they’d know how to rule...
bookmark
With that in mind, IMO the SCOTUS cannot ignore it indefinitely...They have sworn to uphold the Constitution with its requirement for the Executive branch.
IMO the real problem is BO (the Executive branch), has challenged and diminished the power and authority of the Judicial branch before he has even taken office. What will he attempt to do after he is in office?
“For your listening and dining pleasure; I present to you, the reader, an updated SCOTUS docket, replete with a date FOR conference:”
>>> Dec 17 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 9, 2009. <<<
Dec 17 2008 Application (08A505) denied by Justice Kennedy.
No. 08-570
Title: Philip J. Berg, Petitioner
v.
Barack Obama, et al.
Docketed: October 31, 2008
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Case Nos.: (08-4340)
Rule 11
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oct 30 2008 Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 1, 2008)
Oct 31 2008 Application (08A391) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Nov 3 2008 Supplemental brief of applicant Philip J. Berg filed.
Nov 3 2008 Application (08A391) denied by Justice Souter.
Nov 18 2008 Waiver of right of respondents Federal Election Commission, et al. to respond filed.
Dec 1 2008 Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Bill Anderson.
Dec 8 2008 Application (08A505) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Dec 9 2008 Application (08A505) denied by Justice Souter.
Dec 15 2008 Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 17 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 9, 2009.
Dec 17 2008 Application (08A505) denied by Justice Kennedy.
~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Philip J. Berg 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 (610) 825-3134
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
Party name: Philip J. Berg
Attorneys for Respondents:
Gregory G. Garre Solicitor General (202) 514-2217
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Party name: Federal Election Commission, et al.
Other:
Lawrence J. Joyce Lawrence J. Joyce LLC (520) 584-0236
1517 N. Wilmot Rd., #215
Tucson, AZ 85712
barmemberlj@earthlink.net
Party name: Bill Anderson
Yup good news. Obama is starting to sweat again. ;-)
Since Minnesota is the only state in which the election is not final, couldn’t Governor Pawlenty refuse to sanction the election and demand that Obama produce the proper birth certificate? Does he have the balls to do it if he could?
Thank you, hoosiermama. Sorry everyone; I just hit Private Reply, tried to stop it - ah, too late.
Ping to #265.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2150291/posts?page=265#265
-
#175; Comment by MHGinTN:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2149875/posts?page=175#175
-
Obama Selective service Registration forgery revisited
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2150313/posts
-
Off Topic but might be of interest to anyone who has, or had, a military connection:
#28:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2149970/posts?page=28#28
Short answer, no. Long answer: Pawlenty is a RINO at heart and the fundamental Constitutional contract isn’t all that relative to such folks now.
Someone should send the Selective Service Registry information to the Globe. They seem to be the only one interested in printing controversy.
bump
It means that some have been trying to float the lie that Berg’s case is dead at SCOTUS. These folks are liars working the obamanoid side of the street, pretending to be thoughful conservative posters. The fact that it will be brought up in conference January 9th means that the case is not dead and that the Justices will discuss the issues and decide whether to grant certiori (full hearing before the bench) or not. Go back through this thread as an example of these agitprops trying to ‘astroturf’ (you can look that one up on mikipedia, to learn about David Axelrod’s little deceits) the issue at FR.
BTW, welcome to FR, n00bie. [N00b is the not so nice version, n00bie is the friendlier version.]
You’re off to a good start....Ask lots of questions. There a some folks here that will give you informative links, legal opinions, and even share their expertise in areas from A-Z.
and then there’s the other group.....AAAARRRRGGGHHHH!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.