Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gwinnett County Police Break Down Door To Wrong House
wsb web site ^ | 12/10/08 | WSB news

Posted on 12/11/2008 3:52:51 AM PST by from occupied ga

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 last
Comment #141 Removed by Moderator

To: TaxRelief

I suggest that you stop your knee jerk “counter attacks” and review what has actually been posted on this thread.

Otherwise, many of us will just assume you are paid by someone to endlessly spout “crap” for some reason, known only to you, and whoever pays you.

Have a nice day!


142 posted on 12/11/2008 7:21:37 PM PST by sarasmom (Buyers Remorse Date : Place your bets ladies and gentlemen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
The very first sentence in the thread is;

>>Gwinnett County police said they accidentally broke down the door to the wrong house before going to the correct house and arresting a man on drug charges.<<

Let me see if I can spell this out SO simply that perhaps even YOU can understand it.

The article made NO reference to DRUGS BEING FOUND, OR SEIZED in the raid.(In fact, YOU made no reference to drugs in your first post on the subject, ONLY the cash.) Yes, the article said that the suspect was arrested on "drug charges", and only mentioned the 24,000 dollars in cash.

...Which begs the question: Does the mere possession of (what the government believes to be) "too much " cash automatically make one a "drug dealer" (according to the article), or a "criminal" (according to you)?

Your posts make me think that you are using drugs, and that you are an ignorant F !

And yours lead me to believe that I am wasting my time debating with someone who lacks the reading comprehension skills necessary to engage in a mature conversation.

143 posted on 12/12/2008 2:41:52 AM PST by PalmettoMason (Can't we all just get along? At least until I'm finished reloading?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
go hump somone else's leg

Alright, alright. There's no need to flirt, or bully.

Of all the groups to call "jackboot lickers", you chose Freepers.

That's pretty funny.

144 posted on 12/12/2008 5:18:50 AM PST by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: laotzu

The anarchists are crawling out of the woodwork.


145 posted on 12/12/2008 6:16:34 AM PST by TaxRelief (Walmart: Keeping my family on-budget since 1993.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
The anarchists are crawling out of the woodwork

There has to be some kind of spray for that. Damn woodwork crawlers!

146 posted on 12/12/2008 6:21:37 AM PST by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
Are you arguing against no-knock raids? (Then you apparently don’t want to see police gather any actual evidence that can result in a conviction.)

No knock raids are a violation of the US Constitution. Everyone that engages in them is a criminal.

Do you believe in the law or the Constitution? Apparently not.
147 posted on 12/12/2008 4:36:56 PM PST by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: microgood

“Believe in” the constitution? What an odd choice of words.

Do you mean in a spiritual way? Like a religion?


148 posted on 12/12/2008 7:40:17 PM PST by TaxRelief (Walmart: Keeping my family on-budget since 1993.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
Do you mean in a spiritual way? Like a religion?

Only in the sense that those that are trying to preserve and defend freedom and the Constitution are the good guys, and those that seek to undermine it are evil.

Allowing no-knock searches sets us back about 400 years of progress in obtaining basic human rights from government, which is bad. But those that made it happen will suffer the loss of their immortal soul, which is good.
149 posted on 12/13/2008 12:31:05 PM PST by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief

May I suggest you calmly revisit this thread, and starting from the article, read it, in its entirety?


150 posted on 12/15/2008 5:49:48 PM PST by sarasmom (Buyers Remorse Date : Place your bets ladies and gentlemen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom

Done. And I have read the incident reports for the last 10 years. The exaggerations on this thread are many.

I still believe some no-knock raids are critical in certain situations (specifically long-term hostage and missing person cases).

However, citizens within individual states and communities need to get active and establish that training of SWAT teams and chief LEO’s is effective within their own spheres.

I personally will do what I can in my community to make sure our police know what they are doing and when they can do it.


151 posted on 12/16/2008 4:44:30 AM PST by TaxRelief (Walmart: Keeping my family on-budget since 1993.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
We have made progress in communicating clearly.

You stated “I still believe some no-knock raids are critical in certain situations (specifically long-term hostage and missing person cases).”

Few would argue that.Certainly, I could agree with you, on a case by case basis.

But the specific raid(s) discussed on this thread, and the general uneasiness many of us have with no-knock raids in law enforcement operations, IS precisely the point.

Some “options” must never be allowed to become thought of as normal and/or routine operations.

So, I contend we are actually in full agreement. Neither of us think the no-knock raid conducted by LEOs was warranted in this case. And the fact that they screwed it up, makes it even more ...distastefull.

152 posted on 12/17/2008 8:20:14 PM PST by sarasmom (Buyers Remorse Date : Place your bets ladies and gentlemen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson