Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj

You know that is what I heard, but when I went to the individual states to look it up, it looked like McCain still would have lost Indiana, it was close though, 19,243 for Barr and a loss of 25,836 for McCain... at least that is my notes.. People like Barr tick me off, he didn’t have the guts to run in the primary and went in just to act as a spoiler.


22 posted on 12/10/2008 7:58:18 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Arizona Carolyn

Hmm, I’m looking at Dave Leip’s site and this is how he has it:

Barack H. Obama (D) 1,374,039 49.91%
John S. McCain (R) 1,345,648 48.88%
Bob Barr (L) 29,257 1.06%

Barr appeared, by roughly a thousand votes, to have cost McCain. It’s shocking that McCain even lost at all even with Barr, since the state hadn’t voted Democrat for President since 1964.


25 posted on 12/10/2008 8:05:25 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Arizona Carolyn

In NC it’s looks like he’d need half the Barr votes to win so yes he’d have gotten that.

He’d need nearly all in Indiana. Some would’ve not voted or voted and I’m sure some would have Gobama-ed (do we make enough words from “Obama” or what?). Some anti-war zealots.


33 posted on 12/11/2008 2:13:23 AM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson